help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 12: 215-226 (1972)
© 1972 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gibbs, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gibbs, C. L.

Energetics of Isometric and Isotonic Twitches in Toad Sartorius

J. B. Chapman and C. L. Gibbs

ABSTRACT

Contractile energetics have been studied in twitches of toad sartorius muscle at 6-7°C. Isometric and isotonic energy production has been measured and plotted against a wide range of developed tensions and tension-time integrals. These parameters were varied by altering the isotonic load or by changing the preset isometric length. The isometric tension-independent heat was 1.12 ±0.18 (SD) mcal/g. The isometric heat coefficient Pl0/H was 12.0 ±1.4 in muscles having twitch to tetanus ratios ranging from 0.4 to 0.6. Isometric enthalpy increased monotonically with tension or tension-time integral but the correlation between isometric heat and these parameters was poor. Isotonic enthalpy consumption was always higher than isometric enthalpy for any given tension or tension-time integral; however, isotonic heat production was consistently less than isometric heat production. The isotonic heat for the highest load (3 g) was not significantly different from the isometric tension-independent heat. Thus isotonic heat production first decreased and then increased with increasing tension or tension-time integral. In the discussion it is shown that the results conflict with all current interpretations of muscle energetics.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the Biophysical Society.