help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 12: 227-236 (1972)
© 1972 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gibbs, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gibbs, C. L.

An Energetic Model of Muscle Contraction

J. B. Chapman and C. L. Gibbs

ABSTRACT

Initial energy utilization in the twitch is visualized as the result of the activity of two distinct processes. The first is the calcium-pumping activity of the sarcoplasmic reticulum, which has a constant energy requirement under normal conditions. The second is the chemomechanical transduction process consisting of a variable number of quantal contractile events, each with a fixed enthalpy equal to the molecular enthalpy of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis in vivo. This enthalpy appears either as heat or as contractile element work. Total enthalpy varies according to the number of quantal contractile events that occur in the twitch cycle. The basis of the variation is suggested to be velocity-dependent activity of the actomyosin ATPase, allowing more quantal events to occur in a contraction cycle when shortening occurs. The classical designation "activation heat" is held to be appropriate for the first process. The partition of the enthalpy of the second process that is currently in vogue is held to be misleading and a new formulation is suggested in which the properties of the quantal contractile event are reflected in general terms. The formulation of the proposed transduction model represents a conceptual return to the viscoelastic theory, but at a quantal level. The model can explain the results of the preceding paper and is adaptable to different muscles without having to postulate fundamental differences in energy utilization.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the Biophysical Society.