Biophysical Journal 12: 815-831 (1972)
© 1972 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lavorel, J. Articles by Joliot, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lavorel, J. Articles by Joliot, P.

A Connected Model of the Photosynthetic Unit

ABSTRACT

The concept of photosynthetic unit (PSU) is reviewed in the light of the authors' results in the fields of fluorescence and luminescence (delayed light). Models of PSU are mainly distinguished by the amount of exciton exchange which is allowed between units. The "separate" model, with its "first-order" character, is not consistent with fluorescence kinetic data. The sigmoidal rise of fluorescence under actinic light is best explained by "nonseparate" models; however, most of these models assume a delocalization of excitons or centers. The "connected" model introduced here is not subject to this criticism. It discloses a new effect (the "îlot" effect): a nonrandom grouping of fluorescent units the consequences of which are discussed. It is noted that a "two-quantum" model for the photochemical reaction gives results very similar to those of the connected model. A relation between luminescence intensity and fluorescence yield is seen as a necessary consequence of the PSU concept. Its meaning is different in separate and nonseparate models. This relation is discussed in connection with the true system II fluorescence emission.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Rappaport, A. Cuni, L. Xiong, R. Sayre, and J. Lavergne Charge Recombination and Thermoluminescence in Photosystem II Biophys. J., March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1948 - 1958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]