help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 16: 1-11 (1976)
© 1976 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, E A
Right arrow Articles by Hochmuth, R M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, E A
Right arrow Articles by Hochmuth, R M

Membrane viscoelasticity.

E A Evans and R M Hochmuth

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we develop a theory for viscoelastic behavior of large membrane deformations and apply the analysis to the relaxation of projections produced by small micropipette aspiration of red cell discocytes. We show that this relaxation is dominated by the membrane viscosity and that the cytoplasmic and extracellular fluid flow have negligible influence on the relaxation time and can be neglected. From preliminary data, we estimate the total membrane "viscosity" when the membrane material behaves in an elastic solid manner. The total membrane viscosity is calculated to be 10(-3) dyn-s/cm, which is a surface viscosity that is about three orders of magnitude greater than the surface viscosity of lipid membrane components (as determined by "fluidity" measurements). It is apparent that the lipid bilayer contributes little to the fluid dynamic behavior of the whole plasma membrane and that a structural matrix dominates the viscous dissipation. However, we show that viscous flow in the membrane is not responsible for the temporal dependence of the isotropic membrane tension required to produce lysis and that the previous estimates of Rand, Katchalsky, et al., for "viscosity" are six to eight orders of magnitude too large.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
J. Schmitz, M. Benoit, and K.-E. Gottschalk
The Viscoelasticity of Membrane Tethers and Its Importance for Cell Adhesion
Biophys. J., August 1, 2008; 95(3): 1448 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
P. Bagchi
Mesoscale Simulation of Blood Flow in Small Vessels
Biophys. J., March 15, 2007; 92(6): 1858 - 1877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
M. Sun, J. S. Graham, B. Hegedus, F. Marga, Y. Zhang, G. Forgacs, and M. Grandbois
Multiple Membrane Tethers Probed by Atomic Force Microscopy
Biophys. J., December 1, 2005; 89(6): 4320 - 4329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the Biophysical Society.