Biophysical Journal 16: 43-57 (1976)
© 1976 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shaw, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shaw, M

Interpretation of osmotic pressure in solutions of one and two nondiffusible components.

ABSTRACT

Osmotic pressure data from aqueous solutions of nondiffusible serum albumin (BSA), chondroitin sulfate (CHS), and dextran T110 (D110), taken singly and in binary combinations, were interpreted in terms of excluded volume. The principal solvent was phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.2, at 23 degrees C. Osmotic pressures were measured with a membrane osmometer fitted with Amicon PM-10 membranes. Data from each solution were fit by stepwise regression with a three- or four-term polynomial in integral powers of total nondiffusible solute concentration in accordance with the general solution theory of McMillan and Mayer (1945, J. Chem. Phys. 13:276) as extended by Yamakawa (1971, Modern Theory of Polymer Solutions, Harper & Row, New York). The date display a high internal consistency, and the results correlate well with published molecular weights and exclusion data where available. Number average molecular weights calculated from the "first virial coefficients" are: BSA, 67,000 +/- 11%; D110, 76,000 +/- 11%, CHS, 39,000 +/- 6%. Excluded volumes (in cubic centimeters per molecule) calculated from the "second virial coefficients" are: BSA, 0.97 X 10(-18); D110, 3.04 X 10(-18); CHS, 14.3 X 10(-18); BSA-D110, 6.8 X 10(-18); BSA-CHS, 7.8 X 10(-18). Uncertainty is about 30%. An empirical model for interpretation of calculated excluded volumes is proposed. It appears that CHS has the "largest" exclusion effect of the three molecules.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. O. Chahine, F. H. Chen, C. T. Hung, and G. A. Ateshian Direct Measurement of Osmotic Pressure of Glycosaminoglycan Solutions by Membrane Osmometry at Room Temperature Biophys. J., September 1, 2005; 89(3): 1543 - 1550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]