help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 16: 991-1001 (1976)
© 1976 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, K R
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, D O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foster, K R
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, D O

The electrical resistivity of cytoplasm.

K R Foster, J M Bidinger and D O Carpenter

ABSTRACT

The apparent cytoplasmic resistivity of two different giant cells has been measured using an extension of a previously developed single microelectrode technique. Each cell is penetrated by a metal microelectrode whose complex impedance is measured as a function of frequency between 500 kHz and 5.7 MHz. By plotting the measured impedance data on the complex Z plane and extrapolating the data to infinite frequency, the substantial effects of electrode polarization can be overcome. For Aplysia giant neurons and muscle fibers of the giant barnacle, the extrapolated cytoplasmic specific resistivities are 40 and 74 omega-cm, respectively, at infinite frequency. The barnacle data are in excellent agreement with sarcoplasmic resistivity values derived from the measured cable properties of other marine organisms, and from high frequency conductivity cell measurements in intact barnacle muscle tissue. In the Aplysia neurons, the frequency-dependent part of the electrode impedance is larger when the electrode is in a cell than when it is in an electrolyte solution with the same specific resistivity as the aqueous cytoplasm; however, the phase angle of the frequency-dependent component of the electrode impedance is the same in both cases. This suggests that the high apparent values of cytoplasmic resistivity found using the single microelectrode technique at lower frequencies probably reflect an artifact caused by reduction of the effective surface area of the electrode by intracellular membranes, with a corresponding increase in its polarization impedance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the Biophysical Society.