help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 22: 295-306 (1978)
© 1978 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, C F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, C F

Interactions between intrinsic membrane protein and electric field. An approach to studying nerve excitability.

C F Stevens

ABSTRACT

We have approached the problem of nerve excitability through three questions: (a) What is the diagram for a channel? That is, what conformational states can the protein assume, and what transitions between these conformations are permitted? (b) What is the channel conductance associated with each conformation the channel can assume? (c) How do the rates for conformational transition depend upon membrane potential? These three questions arise from a standard statistical mechanical treatment of a nerve membrane containing several classes of identical, independent channels. Gating of channels, in this view, is associated with conformational changes of the channel protein, and it is assumed these conformations are distinct. The precise formulation of these questions is presented in terms of the theoretical treatment, and the approaches we have taken to answer the questions are indicated. Our present results indicate: Transition rates should depend exponentially on membrane potential over a limited voltage range, but probably will show a more complex dependence for extremes of the range; channels probably can take on only two conductances, open and shut, but more complicated situations are not entirely excluded; the diagram for a channel cannot be determined from standard voltage clamp data alone, but by studying gating currents and conductance fluctuations, it should be possible to select between alternative plausible physical mechanisms.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
A. Kuzmenkin, F. Bezanilla, and A. M. Correa
Gating of the Bacterial Sodium Channel, NaChBac: Voltage-dependent Charge Movement and Gating Currents
J. Gen. Physiol., September 27, 2004; 124(4): 349 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
B. Chanda and F. Bezanilla
Tracking Voltage-dependent Conformational Changes in Skeletal Muscle Sodium Channel during Activation
J. Gen. Physiol., October 29, 2002; 120(5): 629 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. G. Klemic, D. M. Durand, and S. W. Jones
Activation Kinetics of the Delayed Rectifier Potassium Current of Bullfrog Sympathetic Neurons
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1998; 79(5): 2345 - 2357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. F. Gilly, R. Gillette, and M. McFarlane
Fast and Slow Activation Kinetics of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels in Molluscan Neurons
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1997; 77(5): 2373 - 2384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C. Stevens
Biophysical studies of ion channels
Science, September 21, 1984; 225(4668): 1346 - 1350.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1978 by the Biophysical Society.