help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 25: 313-322 (1979)
© 1979 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brill, A S
Right arrow Articles by Hampton, D A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brill, A S
Right arrow Articles by Hampton, D A

Quantitative evaluation of contributions to electron paramagnetic resonance line widths in ferric hemoglobin single crystals.

A S Brill and D A Hampton

ABSTRACT

The contributions to the dipolar broadening of ferric magnetic resonances, from crystals of hemoglobin for which the atomic coordinates are known, have been calculated. The total second moment of the g = 2 resonance so determined is about 50 (MHz)2 or 5.0 G (peak-to-trough), figures consistent with the range of values found from analysis of experimental data. Two-thirds of this second moment comes from the two protons of the H2O molecule coordinated to the iron. Treatment with D2O is predicted to reduce the total second moment at g = 2 to about 25 (MHz)2, whereas the experimental measurements on single crystals show no decrease. If the structure of the tetramer is assumed to be the same when in solution as in the crystal, the total second moment is readily redetermined for hemoglobin in solution; the value so obtained is found to be significantly smaller than that from analysis of the g = 2 resonance measured in frozen solution. These two unexpected observations can be explained in terms of distributions in spin Hamiltonian parameters, the spread depending upon the nature of the sample--crystal or solution, ordinary or heavy water-treated. This distribution in H2O and D2O solutions appears to be about the same, since the measured differences in component line width agree with the calculated difference in dipolar contributions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1979 by the Biophysical Society.