help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 30: 51-67 (1980)
© 1980 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, M

Geometrical factors influencing muscle force development. I. The effect of filament spacing upon axial forces.

M Schoenberg

ABSTRACT

The influence of geometry on the force and stiffness measured during muscle contraction at different sarcomere lengths is examined by using three specific models of muscle cross-bridge geometry which are based upon the double-hinge model of H. E. Huxley (Science [Wash. D.C.]. 1969, 164:1356-1366) extended to three dimensions. The force generated during muscle contraction depends upon the orientation of the individual cross-bridge force vectors and the distribution of the cross-bridges between various states. For the simplest models, in which filament separation has no effect upon cross-bridge distribution, it is shown that changes in force vectors accompanying changes in myofilament separation between sarcomere lengths 2.0 and 3.65 microgram in an intact frog skeletal muscle fiber have only a small effect upon axial force. The simplest models, therefore, produce a total axial force proportional to the overlap between the actin and myosin filaments and independent of filament separation. However, the analysis shows that it is possible to find assumptions that produce a cross-bridge model in which the axial force is not independent of filament spacing. It is also shown that for some modes of attachment of subfragment-1 (S1) to actin the azimuthal location of the actin site is important in determining the axial force. A mode of S1 attachment to actin similar to that deduced by Moore et al. (J. Mol. Biol., 1970, 50:279-294), however, exhibits rather constant cross-bridge behavior over a wide range of actin site location.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
B. M. MILLMAN
The Filament Lattice of Striated Muscle
Physiol Rev, April 1, 1998; 78(2): 359 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
G Cecchi, M. Bagni, P. Griffiths, C. Ashley, and Y Maeda
Detection of radial crossbridge force by lattice spacing changes in intact single muscle fibers
Science, December 7, 1990; 250(4986): 1409 - 1411.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the Biophysical Society.