Biophysical Journal 30: 79-97 (1980)
© 1980 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fohlmeister, J F Articles by Poppele, R E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fohlmeister, J F Articles by Poppele, R E

Excitation properties of the squid axon membrane and model systems with current stimulation. Statistical evaluation and comparison.

ABSTRACT

The space-clamped squid axon membrane and two versions of the Hodgkin-Huxley model (the original, and a strongly adapting version) are subjected to a first order dynamic analysis. Stable, repetitive firing is induced by phase-locking nerve impulses to sinusoidal currents. The entrained impulses are then pulse position modulated by additional, small amplitude perturbation sinusoidal currents with respect to which the frequencies response of impulse density functions are measured. (Impulse density is defined as the number of impulses per unit time of an ensemble of membranes with each membrane subject to the same stimulus). Two categories of dynamic response are observed: one shows clear indications of a corner frequency, the other has the corner frequency obscured by dynamics associated with first order conductance perturbations in the interspike interval. The axon membrane responds with first order perturbations whereas the unmodified Hodgkin-Huxley model does not. Quantitative dynamic signatures suggest that the relaxation times of axonal recovery excitation variables are twice as long as those of the corresponding model variables. A number of other quantitative differences between axon and models, including the values of threshold stimuli are also observed.