Article Information

• PDF (5195 kb)

PubMed

• Articles by D.L. Caspar

Related Articles

• Structural Polymorphism of the Major Capsid Protein of a Dou...

  Structural Polymorphism of the Major Capsid Protein of a Double-Stranded RNA Virus: An Amphipathic α Helix as a Molecular Switch Structure, Volume 13, Issue 7, 1 July 2005, Pages 1007-1017 Irene Saugar, Daniel Luque, Ana Oña, José F. Rodríguez, José L. Carrascosa, Benes L. Trus and José R. Castón Summary The infectious bursal disease virus T=13 viral particle is composed of two major proteins, VP2 and VP3. Here, we show that the molecular basis of the conformational flexibility of the major capsid protein precursor, pVP2, is an amphipatic α helix formed by the sequence GFKDIIRAIR. VP2 containing this α helix is able to assemble into the T=13 capsid only when expressed as a chimeric protein with an N-terminal His tag. An amphiphilic α helix, which acts as a conformational switch, is thus responsible for the inherent structural polymorphism of VP2. The His tag mimics the VP3 C-terminal region closely and acts as a molecular triggering factor. Using cryo-electron microscopy difference imaging, both polypeptide elements were detected on the capsid inner surface. We propose that electrostatic interactions between these two morphogenic elements are transmitted to VP2 to acquire the competent conformations for capsid assembly. Summary | Full Text | PDF (829 kb)

• Inhabiting virus-capsid assembly by altering polymerisation ...

  Inhabiting virus-capsid assembly by altering polymerisation pathways Trends in Biotechnology, Volume 16, Issue 2, 1 February 1998, Pages 61-65 Peter E Prevelige Abstract Virus capsids assemble through the repeated interaction of well-defined protein subunits in a highly specific process. Basic research into the mechanism of protein polymerisation and virus assembly suggest that inhibition of the protein–protein interactions necessary for assembly is a valid therapeutic strategy. Computer models of virus-capsid assembly have located vulnerable stages in assembly, and small-molecule inhibitors of virus assembly have been identified. The challenge will be identifying agents that block assembly with the required specificity. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (298 kb)

• Freedom and restraint: themes in virus capsid assembly

  Freedom and restraint: themes in virus capsid assembly Structure, Volume 8, Issue 8, 1 August 2000, Pages R157-R162 Terje Dokland Summary Viruses assemble protective capsids from several copies of one or a few structural proteins. This is accomplished through a combination of conformational flexibility and control mechanisms that restrict this flexibility. This review will discuss some of these mechanisms in light of the many recent results in this area. Summary | Full Text | PDF (336 kb)

• …more

Abstract

Purposeful switching among different conformational states exerts self-control in the construction and action of protein assemblies. Quasi-equivalence, conceived to explain icosahedral virus structure, arises by differentiation of identical protein subunits into different conformations that conserve essential bonding specificity. Mechanical models designed to represent the energy distribution in the structure, rather than just the arrangement of matter, are used to explore flexibility and self-controlled movements in virus particles. Information about the assembly of bacterial flagella, actin, tobacco mosaic virus and the T4 bacteriophage tail structure show that assembly can be controlled by switching the subunits from an inactive, unsociable form to an active, associable form. Energy to drive this change is provided by the intersubunit bonding in the growing structure; this self-control of assembly by conformational switching is called "autostery", by homology with allostery. A mechanical model of the contractile T4 tail sheath has been constructed to demonstrate how self-controlled activation of a latent bonding potential can drive a purposeful movement. The gradient of quasi-equivalent conformations modelled in the contracting tail sheath has suggested a workable mechanism for self-determination of tail tube length. Concerted action by assemblies of identical proteins may often depend on individually differentiated movements.