Biophysical Journal 32: 17-33 (1980)
© 1980 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Finney, J L Articles by Goodfellow, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Finney, J L Articles by Goodfellow, J

Solvent effects and polar interactions in the structural stability and dynamics of globular proteins.

ABSTRACT

Using detailed hydrogen bonding, surface exposure, internal environment, and solvent interaction calculations on several proteins, in conjunction wit data from quantum mechanical hydrogen-bonding studies, various contributions to the free energy of globular estimated and their likely relative significance discussed. A picture emerges of globular proteins as extremely well-fitting jigsaw-puzzles, in which no single driving force dominates the marginal stability of the native conformation. Rather, the folded structure is seen as the result of a complex global maximization of several strongly-interacting driving forces. In particular, the necessity to maintain very efficient internal hydrogen-bonding, and the role of the solvent as a hydrogen-bond sink, are stressed as strong constraints on the (incomplete) maximization of hydrophobic effects. The possible significance of internal dipole-induced dipole interactions is discussed tentatively. Although quantitative estimates of the various contributions remain uncertain, consideration of effective force constants suggests that polar, including solvent, interactions may largely determine the overall curvatures of the native conformation's potential well, and be important in controlling the flexibility of local regions which are important for the exact positioning of groups during enzyme catalysis, as well as the molecule's overall dynamics. In contrast, hydrophobic interactions change less for small geometrical perturbations, and seem more relevant to directing the folding protein. along a path to a region in configurational space where the polar interactions can switch on for the final "docking".

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. M. Klotz Ligand-Receptor Complexes: Origin and Development of the Concept J. Biol. Chem., January 2, 2004; 279(1): 1 - 12. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Berisio, L. Vitagliano, L. Mazzarella, and A. Zagari Crystal structure of the collagen triple helix model [(Pro-Pro-Gly)10]3 Protein Sci., February 1, 2002; 11(2): 262 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ohmura, T. Ueda, Y. Hashimoto, and T. Imoto Tolerance of point substitution of methionine for isoleucine in hen egg white lysozyme Protein Eng. Des. Sel., June 1, 2001; 14(6): 421 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Burley and G. Petsko Aromatic-aromatic interaction: a mechanism of protein structure stabilization Science, July 5, 1985; 229(4708): 23 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]