help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 33: 233-242 (1981)
© 1981 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trissl, H W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trissl, H W

The concept of chemical capacitance, A critique.

H W Trissl

ABSTRACT

The concept of chemical capacitance as introduced by Hong and Mauzerall (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1974. 71:1564) is critically reexamined. This novel capacitance was introduced to explain the time-course of flash-induced photocurrents observed in lipid bilayer membranes containing porphyrins. According to Hong and Mauzerall, the chemical capacitance results from a combination of three fundamental capacitances: the geometric membrane capacitance and the two interfacial double layer capacitances. The concept of chemical capacitance is questioned for the following reasons: (i) The system analysis is insufficiently determinate. (ii) The measured chemical capacitance is approximately 0.16% of that predicted by the theory. (iii) The fact that only 20% of the membrane area is illuminated was not considered in the analysis. The latter point offers an alternative explanation of the capacitance in question: this capacitance may reflect that fraction of the total membrane capacitance that is photochemically active. If so, the concept of chemical capacitance lacks general significance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the Biophysical Society.