Biophysical Journal 40: 121-128 (1982)
© 1982 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chiu, Y L Articles by Ford, L E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chiu, Y L Articles by Ford, L E

Velocity transients and viscoelastic resistance to active shortening in cat papillary muscle.

ABSTRACT

When isotonic force steps were applied to activated papillary muscles, the velocity was almost never constant. Early rapid shortening associated with the step persisted for 2-7 ms after the step ends. The early rapid shortening is attributed to lightly damped series elastic recoil and velocity transients of the contractile elements. In most steps, the subsequent velocity declines progressively with shortening, and most of the decline in velocity can be accounted for by compression of a viscoelastic element in parallel with the contractile elements. To demonstrate this, the time course of isotonic velocity was compared with a model in which the force-velocity characteristics of the contractile element were assumed to be constant, and the decline in velocity was due to increasing compression of the viscoelastic element. This model predicted the observed results except that the predicted velocities rose progressively above the measured values for steps to light loads applied late in the twitch, and fell below the velocity trace for heavy loads applied early in the twitch. These deviations would occur if rapid shortening caused deactivation late in the twitch, and if activation were rising early in the twitch. A conditioning step applied to the muscle during the rise of force depressed both isometric force and maximum velocity measured at the peak of force; isometric force was more depressed with later conditioning steps than with earlier steps, while maximum velocity was depressed by about the same extent with both early and late steps. This difference between the effects on isometric force and maximum velocity are explained by a combination of deactivation and viscoelastic load.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Denslow Constraints on cardiac hypertrophy imposed by myocardial viscosity J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2000; 89(3): 1022 - 1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]