Biophysical Journal 48: 299-309 (1985)
© 1985 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brink, P R Articles by Ramanan, S V Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brink, P R Articles by Ramanan, S V

A model for the diffusion of fluorescent probes in the septate giant axon of earthworm. Axoplasmic diffusion and junctional membrane permeability.

ABSTRACT

The diffusion of the three fluorescent probes dichlorofluorescein, carboxyfluorescein, and Lucifer Yellow within the septate median giant axon of the earthworm was monitored using fluorometric methods. A diffusion model was derived that allowed computation of the apparent axoplasmic diffusion coefficient, junctional membrane permeability (septal membranes), and plasma membrane permeability for each probe. Dichlorofluorescein and carboxyfluorescein have similar apparent axoplasmic diffusion coefficients, which were reduced by a factor of eight relative to that predicted from the Einstein-Stokes equation. Nonspecific reversible binding appears to be the major cause of the retarded diffusion coefficients. Junctional membrane permeability for dichlorofluorescein was 4.7 to 73-fold greater than that for carboxyfluorescein. This difference could not be explained on the basis of molecular size but can be explained by the difference in charge between the two molecules. Diffusion coefficients and junctional membrane permeabilities remained constant with time for both dyes. The diffusion of Lucifer Yellow within the axoplasm and permeability through the junctional membranes did not remain constant with time but declined. From this it was inferred that Lucifer Yellow experienced a slow, irreversible binding to axoplasmic elements. All three probes had finite plasma membrane permeabilities.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Levavi-Sivan, C. L. Bloch, M. J. Gutnick, and I. A. Fleidervish Electrotonic Coupling in the Anterior Pituitary of a Teleost Fish Endocrinology, March 1, 2005; 146(3): 1048 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Nitsche, H.-C. Chang, P. A. Weber, and B. J. Nicholson A Transient Diffusion Model Yields Unitary Gap Junctional Permeabilities from Images of Cell-to-Cell Fluorescent Dye Transfer Between Xenopus Oocytes Biophys. J., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 2058 - 2077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Valiunas, E. C. Beyer, and P. R. Brink Cardiac Gap Junction Channels Show Quantitative Differences in Selectivity Circ. Res., July 26, 2002; 91(2): 104 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T. Kurjiaka, T. D. Steele, M. V. Olsen, and J. M. Burt Gap junction permeability is diminished in proliferating vascular smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 1998; 275(6): C1674 - C1682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Christ, D. C. Spray, M. El-Sabban, L. K. Moore, and P. R. Brink Gap Junctions in Vascular Tissues: Evaluating the Role of Intercellular Communication in the Modulation of Vasomotor Tone Circ. Res., October 1, 1996; 79(4): 631 - 646. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				V Verselis, R. White, D. Spray, and M. Bennett Gap junctional conductance and permeability are linearly related Science, October 24, 1986; 234(4775): 461 - 464. [Abstract] [PDF]