help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 50: 875-884 (1986)
© 1986 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tözeren, A
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tözeren, A
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, M

The effect of cross-bridge clustering and head-head competition on the mechanical response of skeletal muscle under equilibrium conditions.

A Tözeren and M Schoenberg

ABSTRACT

The effect of cross-bridge clustering and head-head competition on the mechanical response of skeletal muscle under equilibrium conditions is considered. For this purpose, the recent multiple site equilibrium cross-bridge model of Schoenberg (Schoenberg, M., 1985, Biophys. J., 48:467-475) is extended in accordance with the formalism of T.L. Hill (1974, Prog. Biophys, Mol. Biol., 28:267-340) to consider the case where groups of independent cross-bridge heads compete with each other for binding to multiple actin sites. Cooperative behavior between heads is not allowed. Computations indicate that for the double-headed cross-bridge with two independent equivalent heads, the time course of force decay after a stretch is similar to that for the single-headed cross-bridge; that is, the rate constant for force decay is approximately equal to the cross-bridge head detachment rate constant. The results also show that the force decay after a stretch becomes slower than the detachment rate constant of a single head when cross-bridge heads bind adjacently in clusters so that competition between heads for binding to the available actin sites increases. However, if one assumes that the detachment rate constant of an unstrained head in a fiber is comparable to that of an S1 molecule in solution, this effect is not large enough to explain why some of the rate constants for force decay after a stretch in rigor, or in the presence of ATP analogues such as adenyl-5'-yl imidodiphosphate, appear to be significantly slower than the detachment rate constant of S1 from actin in solution.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the Biophysical Society.