help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 52: 177-186 (1987)
© 1987 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mege, J L
Right arrow Articles by Bongrand, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mege, J L
Right arrow Articles by Bongrand, P

Use of cell contour analysis to evaluate the affinity between macrophages and glutaraldehyde-treated erythrocytes.

J L Mege, C Capo, A M Benoliel and P Bongrand

Laboratoire d'Immunologie, Hôpital de Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, France.

ABSTRACT

Recently, several authors evaluated the affinity between lipid bilayers or erythrocyte membranes by analyzing the deformation of cells or vesicles they brought into close contact using micromanipulators. In the present report, we extend this approach in a study of the adhesive properties of rough nucleated cells. Rat peritoneal macrophages were made to bind human red cells modified with glutaraldehyde or glutaraldehyde and polylysine. Conjugates were examined with electron microscopy, and photomicrographs were digitized for quantification of cell surface roughness in and out of adhesion areas. Also, macrophages were subjected to micropipette aspiration to find a relationship between apparent surface tension and area increase. Assuming that this increase was a direct consequence of a smoothing of the cell surface on the submicrometer scale, the actual affinity between macrophages and erythrocytes was estimated. The obtained values ranged between 8.4 X 10(-5) and 18.2 X 10(-5) J/m2. It is concluded that cell surface roughness may be an important parameter of cell adhesion and perhaps deformation. This is made amenable to experimental study by the present approach.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. Pierres, A.-M. Benoliel, D. Touchard, and P. Bongrand
How Cells Tiptoe on Adhesive Surfaces before Sticking
Biophys. J., May 15, 2008; 94(10): 4114 - 4122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
A. Pierres, P. Eymeric, E. Baloche, D. Touchard, A.-M. Benoliel, and P. Bongrand
Cell Membrane Alignment along Adhesive Surfaces: Contribution of Active and Passive Cell Processes
Biophys. J., March 1, 2003; 84(3): 2058 - 2070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
L. Channavajjala, A Eidsath, and W. Saxinger
A simple method for measurement of cell-substrate attachment forces: application to HIV-1 Tat
J. Cell Sci., January 1, 1997; 110(2): 249 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. E. Williams, S. Nagarajan, P. Selvaraj, and C. Zhu
Quantifying the Impact of Membrane Microtopology on Effective Two-dimensional Affinity
J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2001; 276(16): 13283 - 13288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the Biophysical Society.