Biophysical Journal 52: 901-906 (1987)
© 1987 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tozeren, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tozeren, A

The influence of doubly attached crossbridges on the mechanical behavior of skeletal muscle fibers under equilibrium conditions.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064.

ABSTRACT

A simple model of a double-headed crossbridge is introduced to explain the retardation of force decay after an imposed stretch in skeletal muscle fibers under equilibrium conditions. The critical assumption in the model is that once one of the heads of a crossbridge is attached to one of the available actin sites, the attachment of the second head will be restricted to a level of strain determined by the attachment of the first head. The crossbridge structure, namely the connection of both heads of a crossbridge to the same tail region, is assumed to impose this constraint on the spatial configurations of crossbridge heads. The unique feature of the model is the prediction that, in the presence of a ligand (PPi, ADP, AMP-PNP) and absence of Ca2+, the halftime of force decay is many times larger than the inverse rate of detachment of a crossbridge head measured in solution. This prediction is in agreement with measured values of half-times of force decay in fibers under similar conditions (Schoenberg, M., and E. Eisenberg. 1985. Biophys. J. 48:863-871f). It is predicted that a crossbridge head is more likely to re-attach to its previously strained position than remain unattached while the other head is attached, leading to the slow decay of force. Our computations also show that the apparent cooperativity in crossbridge binding observed in experiments (Brenner, B., L. C. Yu, L. E. Greene, E. Eisenberg, and M. Schoenberg. 1986. Biophys. J. 50:1101-1108) can be partially accounted by the double-headed crossbridge attachment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)