Biophysical Journal 53: 863-875 (1988)
© 1988 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Peskoff, A Articles by Bers, D M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Peskoff, A Articles by Bers, D M

Electrodiffusion of ions approaching the mouth of a conducting membrane channel.

Department of Biomathematics and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-1766.

ABSTRACT

The movement of ions in the aqueous medium as they approach the mouth (radius a) of a conducting membrane channel is analyzed. Starting with the Nernst-Planck and Poisson equations, we derive a nonlinear integrodifferential equation for the electric potential, phi(r), a less than or equal to r less than infinity. The formulation allows deviations from charge neutrality and dependence of phi(r) on ion flux. A numerical solution is obtained by converting the equation to an integral equation that is solved by an iterative method for an assumed mouth potential, combined with a shooting method to adjust the mouth potential until the numerical solution agrees with an asymptotic expansion of the potential at r-a much greater than lambda (lambda = Debye length). Approximate analytic solutions are obtained by assuming charge neutrality (Läuger, 1976) and by linearizing. The linear approximation agrees with the exact solution under most physiological conditions, but the charge-neutrality solution is only valid for r much greater than lambda and thus cannot be used unless a much greater than lambda. Families of curves of ion flux vs. potential drop across the electrolyte, phi(infinity)-phi (a), and of permeant ion density at the channel mouth, n1(a), vs. flux are obtained for different values of a/lambda and S = a d phi/dr(a). If a much greater than lambda and S = O, the maximum flux (which is approached when n1(a)----0) is reduced by 50% compared to the value predicted by the charge-neutrality solution. Access resistance is shown to be a factor a/[2 (a + lambda)] times the published formula (Hille, 1968), which was derived without including deviations from charge neutrality and ion density gradients and hence does not apply when there is no counter-ion current. The results are applied to an idealized diffusion-limited channel with symmetric electrolytes. For S = O, the current/voltage curves saturate at a value dependent on a/lambda; for S greater than O, they increase linearly for large voltage.