help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 56: 1229-1243 (1989)
© 1989 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sansom, M S
Right arrow Articles by Usherwood, P N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sansom, M S
Right arrow Articles by Usherwood, P N

Markov, fractal, diffusion, and related models of ion channel gating. A comparison with experimental data from two ion channels.

M S Sansom, F G Ball, C J Kerry, R McGee, R L Ramsey and P N Usherwood

Department of Zoology, University of Nottingham, University Park, United Kingdom.

ABSTRACT

The gating kinetics of single-ion channels are generally modeled in terms of Markov processes with relatively small numbers of channel states. More recently, fractal (Liebovitch et al. 1987. Math. Biosci. 84:37-68) and diffusion (Millhauser et al. 1988. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:1502-1507) models of channel gating have been proposed. These models propose the existence of many similar conformational substrates of the channel protein, all of which contribute to the observed gating kinetics. It is important to determine whether or not Markov models provide the most accurate description of channel kinetics if progress is to be made in understanding the molecular events of channel gating. In this study six alternative classes of gating model are tested against experimental single-channel data. The single-channel data employed are from (a) delayed rectifier K+ channels of NG 108-15 cells and (b) locust muscle glutamate receptor channels. The models tested are (a) Markov, (b) fractal, (c) one-dimensional diffusion, (d) three-dimensional diffusion, (e) stretched exponential, and (f) expo-exponential. The models are compared by fitting the predicted distributions of channel open and closed times to those observed experimentally. The models are ranked in order of goodness-of-fit using a boot-strap resampling procedure. The results suggest that Markov models provide a markedly better description of the observed open and closed time distributions for both types of channel. This provides justification for the continued use of Markov models to explore channel gating mechanisms.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Goychuk and P. Hanggi
Ion channel gating: A first-passage time analysis of the Kramers type
PNAS, March 19, 2002; 99(6): 3552 - 3556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Kurzynski, K. Palacz, and P. Chelminiak
Time course of reactions controlled and gated by intramolecular dynamics of proteins: Predictions of the model of random walk on fractal lattices
PNAS, September 29, 1998; 95(20): 11685 - 11690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the Biophysical Society.