Biophysical Journal 57: 515-523 (1990)
© 1990 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sawyer, D B Articles by Andersen, O S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sawyer, D B Articles by Andersen, O S

Gramicidin single-channel properties show no solvent-history dependence.

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Cornell University Medical College, New York 10021.

ABSTRACT

The structure of membrane-associated gramicidins can depend on the solvent in which they were dissolved prior to membrane incorporation (LoGrasso, P. V., F. Moll, and T. A. Cross 1988. Biophys. J. 54:259-267; Killian, J. A., K. U. Prasad, D. Hains, and D. W. Urry. 1988. Biochemistry. 27:4848-4855). The peptide's solvent history might thus affect the functional characteristics of gramicidin channels (op. cit.). We tested this proposal by examining the properties (conductance, conductance dispersity, and average duration) of channels formed by [Val1]gramicidin A that had been dissolved in eight different solvents. The peptide was incorporated into lipid bilayers either by addition to the aqueous phase (and subsequent adsorption to the membrane) or by cosolubilization with the membrane-forming phospholipid. When the peptide was cosolubilized with the phospholipid, the channel properties did not vary with the solvent used. When the peptide was dissolved in chloroform, benzene, or trifluoroethanol and added through the aqueous phase, the channel properties differed from those found when gramidicin was dissolved in methanol, ethanol, dioxane, dimethylsulfoxide, or ethylacetate. The changes observed with the former three solvents were reproduced by adding them to the aqueous phase, and are therefore due to the ability of these solvents to partition into the membrane and alter the channels' behavior.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Artigas, S. J. Al'Aref, E. A. Hobart, L. F. Diaz, M. Sakaguchi, S. Straw, and O. S. Andersen 2,3-Butanedione Monoxime Affects Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Channel Function through Phosphorylation-Dependent and Phosphorylation-Independent Mechanisms: The Role of Bilayer Material Properties Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2006; 70(6): 2015 - 2026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Lundbaek, P. Birn, A. J. Hansen, R. Sogaard, C. Nielsen, J. Girshman, M. J. Bruno, S. E. Tape, J. Egebjerg, D. V. Greathouse, et al. Regulation of Sodium Channel Function by Bilayer Elasticity: The Importance of Hydrophobic Coupling. Effects of Micelle-forming Amphiphiles and Cholesterol J. Gen. Physiol., April 26, 2004; 123(5): 599 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Goforth, A. K. Chi, D. V. Greathouse, L. L. Providence, R. E. Koeppe II, and O. S. Andersen Hydrophobic Coupling of Lipid Bilayer Energetics to Channel Function J. Gen. Physiol., April 28, 2003; 121(5): 477 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. O'Connell, R. Koeppe 2nd, and O. Andersen Kinetics of gramicidin channel formation in lipid bilayers: transmembrane monomer association Science, November 30, 1990; 250(4985): 1256 - 1259. [Abstract] [PDF]