help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 57: 1155-1166 (1990)
© 1990 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, J C
Right arrow Articles by Okada, Y C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, J C
Right arrow Articles by Okada, Y C

Distortion of magnetic evoked fields and surface potentials by conductivity differences at boundaries in brain tissue.

J C Huang, C Nicholson and Y C Okada

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, New York University Medical Center, New York 10016.

ABSTRACT

We investigated the conditions under which inhomogeneity in electrical conductivity may significantly modify the magnetic evoked field (MEF) due to primary currents (i.e., neuronal currents) in the brain. In the case of an isolated turtle cerebellum immersed in a large bath of physiological saline, our theoretical analysis showed the cerebellar surface to significantly enhance the MEF due to a primary current, by a factor of as much as two, for experimentally determined values of the conductivities of the cerebellar tissue and saline. A further parametric investigation of the conductivity effect revealed that conductivity boundaries may significantly modify the MEF due to neuronal currents located within 1 mm of a conductivity boundary, as would be the case for active neurons near an edema, an anoxic fringe such as might occur during stroke, or a ventricle in the human head. For a stationary neural source, conductivity boundaries may modify the magnitude of its MEF without affecting its temporal waveform. However, this boundary effect was found to be small for a model geometry locally approximating cortical sources in a sulcus or a fissure, where the boundary effects from adjacent sulcal walls tend to cancel each other.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Buch, C. Weber, L. G. Cohen, C. Braun, M. A. Dimyan, T. Ard, J. Mellinger, A. Caria, S. Soekadar, A. Fourkas, et al.
Think to Move: a Neuromagnetic Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System for Chronic Stroke
Stroke, March 1, 2008; 39(3): 910 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
F. Tecchio, C. Porcaro, G. Barbati, and F. Zappasodi
Functional source separation and hand cortical representation for a brain-computer interface feature extraction
J. Physiol., May 1, 2007; 580(3): 703 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Murakami and Y. Okada
Contributions of principal neocortical neurons to magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography signals
J. Physiol., September 15, 2006; 575(3): 925 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the Biophysical Society.