help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 59: 271-277 (1991)
© 1991 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levitt, D G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levitt, D G

General continuum theory for multiion channel. I. Theory.

D G Levitt

Department of Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

ABSTRACT

It is assumed that the channel is completely characterized by three factors: (a) its geometric shape, (b) the potential energy interaction between an ion and the channel wall, and (c) the potential energy interaction between two ions at arbitrary positions in the channel. The total potential energy of an ion in a multiion channel can be described by a summation over factors b and c. The ion-water interaction is described by a continuum diffusion coefficient which is determined by the channel geometry (c). Given this physical description, a theory is described that predicts the flux of all the ion species that are present, with no additional assumptions about, e.g., the maximum number of ions allowed in the channel, location of binding sites or shape of energy barriers. The solution is based on a combination of the Nernst-Planck and Poisson equation. The Poisson potential is corrected for the ion's self potential. A hard sphere ion-ion interaction is included that prevents ions from piling up on top of each other in regions where the channel wall has a high charge density. An exact analytical solution is derived for the region in the bulk solution, far from the channel mouth and this solution is used as a boundary condition for the numerical solution. The numerical solution is obtained by an interactive procedure that is surprisingly efficient. Application of the theory to the acetylcholine receptor channel is described in the companion paper (Levitt, D. G. 1990. Biophys. J. 59:278-288).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gen. Physiol.Home page
G. Kanaporis, G. Mese, L. Valiuniene, T. W. White, P. R. Brink, and V. Valiunas
Gap Junction Channels Exhibit Connexin-specific Permeability to Cyclic Nucleotides
J. Gen. Physiol., March 31, 2008; 131(4): 293 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
H. Chen, B. Ilan, Y. Wu, F. Zhu, K. Schulten, and G. A. Voth
Charge Delocalization in Proton Channels, I: The Aquaporin Channels and Proton Blockage
Biophys. J., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 46 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
H. Chen, Y. Wu, and G. A. Voth
Origins of Proton Transport Behavior from Selectivity Domain Mutations of the Aquaporin-1 Channel
Biophys. J., May 15, 2006; 90(10): L73 - L75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
B. Eisenberg
Why Can't Protons Move through Water Channels?
Biophys. J., December 1, 2003; 85(6): 3427 - 3428.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Biophysical Society.