Biophysical Journal 59: 670-690 (1991)
© 1991 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Simonson, T Articles by Brünger, A T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Simonson, T Articles by Brünger, A T

Microscopic theory of the dielectric properties of proteins.

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511.

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the microscopic mechanisms of charge screening in proteins. The screening of an arbitrary perturbing charge density by a protein and its surrounding solution is characterized by a generalized susceptibility, which is approximately given by the mean dipole-dipole correlation matrix of the system. This susceptibility is a microscopic quantity; the sum of its matrix elements gives the macroscopic susceptibility of continuum electrostatics. When screening of a single perturbing point charge is considered, this susceptibility reduces to a scalar quantity, dependent on position within the protein. The contribution of the positional degrees of freedom of the protein atoms can be estimated from molecular dynamics simulations. This contribution gives rise to large spatial variations of the susceptibility, whose significance for protein function is discussed. The model is applied to the small alpha helix deca-alanine, and to the electron-transfer protein cytochrome c. The results agree qualitatively with previous normal mode calculations. The importance, and the large spatial variations, of charge screening by deca-alanine suggest that dielectric screening may play a role in the binding of charged ligands by helices. In cytochrome c, the dielectric susceptibility in response to a point charge is at a minimum in the central heme region, resulting in a lowering of the reorganization free energy for charge transfer to and from the heme.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Archontis and T. Simonson Proton Binding to Proteins: A Free-Energy Component Analysis Using a Dielectric Continuum Model Biophys. J., June 1, 2005; 88(6): 3888 - 3904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Asthagiri, A. Paliwal, D. Abras, A. M. Lenhoff, and M. E. Paulaitis A Consistent Experimental and Modeling Approach to Light-Scattering Studies of Protein-Protein Interactions in Solution Biophys. J., May 1, 2005; 88(5): 3300 - 3309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Rubinstein and S. Sherman Influence of the Solvent Structure on the Electrostatic Interactions in Proteins Biophys. J., September 1, 2004; 87(3): 1544 - 1557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Blouin and C. J. A. Wallace Protein Matrix and Dielectric Effect in Cytochrome c J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2001; 276(31): 28814 - 28818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Mertz and L. I. Krishtalik Low dielectric response in enzyme active site PNAS, February 29, 2000; 97(5): 2081 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]