Biophysical Journal 60: 389-398 (1991)
© 1991 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Archer, S J Articles by Cafiso, D S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Archer, S J Articles by Cafiso, D S

Dynamics and aggregation of the peptide ion channel alamethicin. Measurements using spin-labeled peptides.

Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22901.

ABSTRACT

Two spin-labeled derivatives of the ion conductive peptide alamethicin were synthesized and used to examine its binding and state of aggregation. One derivative was spin labeled at the C-terminus and the other, a leucine analogue, was spin labeled at the N-terminus. In methanol, both the C and N terminal labeled peptides were monomeric. In aqueous solution, the C-terminal derivative was monomeric at low concentrations, but aggregated at higher concentrations with a critical concentration of 23 microM. In the membrane, the C-terminal label was localized to the membrane-aqueous interface using 13C-NMR, and could assume more than one orientation. The membrane binding of the C-terminal derivative was examined using EPR, and it exhibited a cooperativity seen previously for native alamethicin. However, this cooperativity was not the result of an aggregation of the peptide in the membrane. When the spectra of either the C or N-terminal labeled peptide were examined over a wide range of membrane lipid to peptide ratios, no evidence for aggregation could be found and the peptides remained monomeric under all conditions examined. Because electrical measurements on this peptide provide strong evidence for an ion-conductive aggregate, the ion-conductive form of alamethicin likely represents a minor fraction of the total membrane bound peptide.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Bartucci, R. Guzzi, M. De Zotti, C. Toniolo, L. Sportelli, and D. Marsh Backbone Dynamics of Alamethicin Bound to Lipid Membranes: Spin-Echo Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of TOAC-Spin Labels Biophys. J., April 1, 2008; 94(7): 2698 - 2705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Marsh, M. Jost, C. Peggion, and C. Toniolo TOAC Spin Labels in the Backbone of Alamethicin: EPR Studies in Lipid Membranes Biophys. J., January 15, 2007; 92(2): 473 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Bhargava and J. B. Feix Membrane Binding, Structure, and Localization of Cecropin-Mellitin Hybrid Peptides: A Site-Directed Spin-Labeling Study Biophys. J., January 1, 2004; 86(1): 329 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Rauch, C. G. Ferguson, G. D. Prestwich, and D. S. Cafiso Myristoylated Alanine-rich C Kinase Substrate (MARCKS) Sequesters Spin-labeled Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate in Lipid Bilayers J. Biol. Chem., April 12, 2002; 277(16): 14068 - 14076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hubbard, D. Singleton, M. Rauch, S. Jayasinghe, D. Cafiso, and D. Castle The Secretory Carrier Membrane Protein Family: Structure and Membrane Topology Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2000; 11(9): 2933 - 2947. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				Y. Yu, D. King, and Y. Shin Insertion of a coiled-coil peptide from influenza virus hemagglutinin into membranes Science, October 14, 1994; 266(5183): 274 - 276. [Abstract] [PDF]