help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 61: 704-715 (1992)
© 1992 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schild, D
Right arrow Articles by Riedel, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schild, D
Right arrow Articles by Riedel, H

Significance of glomerular compartmentalization for olfactory coding.

D Schild and H Riedel

Physiologisches Institut, Universität Göttingen, Germany.

ABSTRACT

This paper deals with the dendritic signal processing by mitral cells in the olfactory bulb and its meaning for olfactory coding. The output signals of olfactory receptor neurones are sent to the olfactory bulb where they converge onto the secondary neurones, the mitral cells. On a short time scale, the connectivity between receptor and mitral cells can be assumed to be constant, whereas on a longer time scale, when considering the ongoing de- and regeneration, it is necessary to model the synaptical weights between receptor and mitral cells as variables. In a first approach we used Hebb's rule to this end and presumed that a mitral cell can be represented by one compartment only. In this case, and with a sequence of realistically modeled receptor activity signals, the synaptical weights of all mitral cells converged to the same point though every mitral cell had initial weights different from those of any other mitral cell. This means that a mitral cell, when modeled as one compartment, does not become sensitive to any particular odor quality. A similar lack of quality tuning turned out to occur when one-compartment mitral cells were connected among each other by laterally inhibiting interneurones. We therefore took into account the glomerular fine structure of mitral cell dendrites, assuming electrotonically decoupled dendritic subbranches. This feature together with local inhibitory circuitry at the subbranches led to a fundamentally different type of synaptical convergence pattern. In this case, mitral cells developed differential sensitivities for different odors. Mitral cells have thus to be regarded as multicompartment cells, and local, non-Hebbian learning rules for their afferent synapses are necessary to achieve a reasonable map of odors upon mitral cell activities.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
W. M. Getz and A. Lutz
A Neural Network Model of General Olfactory Coding in the Insect Antennal Lobe
Chem Senses, August 1, 1999; 24(4): 351 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Biophysical Society.