Biophysical Journal 63: 857-861 (1992)
© 1992 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Forsten, K E Articles by Lauffenburger, D A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Forsten, K E Articles by Lauffenburger, D A

Interrupting autocrine ligand-receptor binding: comparison between receptor blockers and ligand decoys.

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign 61801.

ABSTRACT

Stimulation of cell behavioral functions by ligand/receptor binding can be accomplished in autocrine fashion, where cells secrete ligand capable of binding to receptors on their own surfaces. This proximal secretion of autocrine ligands near the surface receptors on the secreting cell suggests that control of these systems by inhibitors of receptor/ligand binding may be more difficult than for systems involving exogenous ligands. Hence, it is of interest to predict the conditions under which successful inhibition of cell receptor binding by the autocrine ligand can be expected. Previous theoretical work using a compartmentalized model for autocrine cells has elucidated the conditions under which addition of solution decoys for the autocrine ligand can interrupt cell receptor/ligand binding via competitive binding of the secreted molecules (Forsten, K. E., and D. A. Lauffenburger. 1992. Biophys. J. 61:1-12.) We now apply a similar modeling approach to examine the addition of solution blockers targeted against the cell receptor. Comparison of the two alternative inhibition strategies reveals that a significantly lower concentration of receptor blockers, compared to ligand decoys, will obtain a high degree of inhibition. The more direct interruption scheme characteristic of the receptor blockers may make them a preferred strategy when feasible.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. I. Monine, A. M. Berezhkovskii, E. J. Joslin, H. S. Wiley, D. A. Lauffenburger, and S. Y. Shvartsman Ligand Accumulation in Autocrine Cell Cultures Biophys. J., April 1, 2005; 88(4): 2384 - 2390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Lauffenburger, G. T. Oehrtman, L. Walker, and H. S. Wiley Real-time quantitative measurement of autocrine ligand binding indicates that autocrine loops are spatially localized PNAS, December 22, 1998; 95(26): 15368 - 15373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Y. Shvartsman, M. P. Hagan, A. Yacoub, P. Dent, H. S. Wiley, and D. A. Lauffenburger Autocrine loops with positive feedback enable context-dependent cell signaling Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): C545 - C559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]