help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 63: 1299-1305 (1992)
© 1992 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egelman, E H
Right arrow Articles by DeRosier, D J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egelman, E H
Right arrow Articles by DeRosier, D J

Image analysis shows that variations in actin crossover spacings are random, not compensatory.

E H Egelman and D J DeRosier

Department of Cell Biology and Neuroanatomy, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis 55455.

ABSTRACT

A recent paper by Bremer et al. (1991. J. Cell Biol. 115:689-703) has argued that the random angular disorder model for actin is wrong, and that the variations in crossover spacing observed in electron micrographs of F-actin filaments can be best explained by a compensatory disorder caused by the lateral slipping of the twin (or two-start) strands which comprise the actin filament. We have analyzed the images of F-actin presented in Bremer et al. and show that their data argues against compensatory disorder and in favor of random disorder, independent of the cause of the disorder. We also revise our estimate of the angular component and show that the magnitude of this disorder is about 5-6 degrees per subunit, which is less than the 10-12 degrees that we originally proposed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
J. N. Forkey, M. E. Quinlan, and Y. E. Goldman
Measurement of Single Macromolecule Orientation by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy
Biophys. J., August 1, 2005; 89(2): 1261 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
N. Volkmann, D. DeRosier, P. Matsudaira, and D. Hanein
An Atomic Model of Actin Filaments Cross-linked by Fimbrin and Its Implications for Bundle Assembly and Function
J. Cell Biol., May 21, 2001; 153(5): 947 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
A. Mehta
Myosin learns to walk
J. Cell Sci., January 6, 2001; 114(11): 1981 - 1998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
D. Hanein, P. Matsudaira, and D. J. DeRosier
Evidence for a Conformational Change in Actin Induced by Fimbrin (N375) Binding
J. Cell Biol., October 20, 1997; 139(2): 387 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
A. McGough, B. Pope, W. Chiu, and A. Weeds
Cofilin Changes the Twist of F-Actin: Implications for Actin Filament Dynamics and Cellular Function
J. Cell Biol., August 25, 1997; 138(4): 771 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Biophysical Society.