help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 64: 325-338 (1993)
© 1993 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGroddy, K A
Right arrow Articles by Oswald, R E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGroddy, K A
Right arrow Articles by Oswald, R E

Analysis of cyclic and acyclic nicotinic cholinergic agonists using radioligand binding, single channel recording, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

K A McGroddy, A A Carter, M M Tubbert and R E Oswald

Department of Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853.

ABSTRACT

The relationship between the structure and function of a series of nicotinic cholinergic agonists has been studied using radioligand binding, single channel recording, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The cyclic compound 1,1-dimethyl-4-acetylpiperazinium iodide and its trifluoromethyl analogue (F3-PIP) interact with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) from both Torpedo electroplaque and BC3H-1 cells at lower concentrations than the acyclic derivatives, N,N,N,N'-tetramethyl-N'-acetylethylenediamine iodide and its fluorinated analogue (F3-TED). The magnitude of the difference in potencies depends on the type of measurement. In binding experiments, the differences between the two classes of compounds depends mainly on the conditions of the experiment. In measurements of the initial interaction with the nAChR, the PIP compounds have an affinity approximately one order of magnitude higher than that of the TED compounds. Longer incubations indicated that the PIP compounds were able to induce a time-dependent shift in receptor affinity consistent with desensitization, whereas the TED compounds were unable to induce such a shift. The activation of single channel currents by the cyclic compounds occurs at concentrations approximately two orders of magnitude lower than for the acyclic compounds, but the TED compounds exhibit a larger degree of channel blockade than the PIP compounds. Previous work (McGroddy, K.A., and R.E. Oswald. 1992. Biophys. J. 64:314-324) has shown that the TED compounds can exist in two energetically distinct conformational states related by an isomerization of the amide bond. 19F nuclear magnetic resonance experiments suggest that the higher energy population of the TED compounds may interact preferentially with the ACh binding sites on the nAChRs and that a significant fraction of the difference between the initial affinity of the PIP and TED compounds may be accounted for by the predominance in solution of a conformational state less able to interact with the ACh binding sites on nAChRs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
G. R. Dawson, K. A. Wafford, A. Smith, G. R. Marshall, P. J. Bayley, J. M. Schaeffer, P. T. Meinke, and R. M. McKernan
Anticonvulsant and Adverse Effects of Avermectin Analogs in Mice Are Mediated through the gamma -Aminobutyric AcidA Receptor
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2000; 295(3): 1051 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. Dudel, M. Schramm, C. Franke, E. Ratner, and H. Parnas
Block of Quantal End-Plate Currents of Mouse Muscle by Physostigmine and Procaine
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 2386 - 2397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Biophysical Society.