help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 64: 1178-1186 (1993)
© 1993 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koenig, S H
Right arrow Articles by Ugolini, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koenig, S H
Right arrow Articles by Ugolini, R

Intermolecular protein interactions in solutions of bovine lens beta L-crystallin. Results from 1/T1 nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion profiles.

S H Koenig, R D Brown, 3rd, A K Kenworthy, A D Magid and R Ugolini

IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598.

ABSTRACT

We report the magnetic field dependence of 1/T1 of solvent water protons and deuterons (nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion, or NMRD, profiles) for solutions of steer lens beta L-crystallin. Such data allow the study of intermolecular protein interactions over a wide concentration range, here 1-34% vol/vol, by providing a measure of the rotational relaxation time of solute macromolecules. We conclude that, for approximately less than 5% protein, the solute particles are noncompact, with a rotationally averaged volume approximately three times that of a compact 60-kD sphere. (Earlier results for alpha-crystallin, approximately 1,000 kD, from optical and osmotic measurements (Vérétout and Tardieu, 1989. J. Mol. Biol. 205:713-728), show a similar, approximately twofold, effect). At intermediate concentrations, to approximately 20% protein, there is evidence for limited association or oligomerization, as found for the structurally related gamma II-crystallin (Koenig et al. 1990. Biophys. J. 57:461-469), to a limiting size about two-thirds that of alpha-crystallin. The difference in NMRD behavior of the three classes of crystallins is consonant with their differing osmotic properties (Vérétout and Tardieu. J. Mol. Biol. 1989, 205:713-728; Kenworthy, McIntosh, and Magid. Biophys. J. 1992. 61:A477; Tardieu et al. 1992. Eur. Biophys. J. 21:1-12). We indicate how the unusual structures and interactions of these three classes of proteins can be combined to optimize transparency and minimize colloid osmotic difficulties in eye lens.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Biophysical Society.