help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 65: 149-163 (1993)
© 1993 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoh, J H
Right arrow Articles by Hansma, P K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoh, J H
Right arrow Articles by Hansma, P K

Structure of the extracellular surface of the gap junction by atomic force microscopy.

J H Hoh, G E Sosinsky, J P Revel and P K Hansma

Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106.

ABSTRACT

The extracellular surface of the gap junction cell-to-cell channels was imaged in phosphate-buffered saline with an atomic force microscope. The fully hydrated isolated gap junction membranes adsorbed to mica were irregular sheets approximately 1-2 microns across and 13.2 (+/- 1.3) nm thick. The top bilayer of the gap junction was dissected by increasing the force applied to the tip or sometimes by increasing the scan rate at moderate forces. The exposed extracellular surface revealed a hexagonal array with a center-to-center spacing of 9.4 (+/- 0.9) nm between individual channels (connexons). Images of individual connexons with a lateral resolution of < 3.5 nm, and in the best case approximately 2.5 nm, were reliably and reproducibly obtained with high-quality tips. These membrane channels protruded 1.4 (+/- 0.4) nm from the extracellular surface of the lipid membrane, and the atomic force microscope tip reached up to 0.7 nm into the pore, which opened up to a diameter of 3.8 (+/- 0.6) nm on the extracellular side.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
F. D Houghton
Role of gap junctions during early embryo development
Reproduction, February 1, 2005; 129(2): 129 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Castro, J. M. Gomez-Hernandez, K. Silander, and L. C. Barrio
Altered Formation of Hemichannels and Gap Junction Channels Caused by C-Terminal Connexin-32 Mutations
J. Neurosci., May 15, 1999; 19(10): 3752 - 3760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
C. I. Foote, L. Zhou, X. Zhu, and B. J. Nicholson
The Pattern of Disulfide Linkages in the Extracellular Loop Regions of Connexin 32 Suggests a Model for the Docking Interface of Gap Junctions
J. Cell Biol., March 9, 1998; 140(5): 1187 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
F Cao, R Eckert, C Elfgang, J. Nitsche, S. Snyder, D. H-ulser, K Willecke, and B. Nicholson
A quantitative analysis of connexin-specific permeability differences of gap junctions expressed in HeLa transfectants and Xenopus oocytes
J. Cell Sci., January 1, 1998; 111(1): 31 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
J. Hoh and C. Schoenenberger
Surface morphology and mechanical properties of MDCK monolayers by atomic force microscopy
J. Cell Sci., January 5, 1994; 107(5): 1105 - 1114.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the Biophysical Society.