Biophysical Journal 67: 613-625 (1994)
© 1994 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in Biophys. J. Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bukauskas, F F Articles by Weingart, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bukauskas, F F Articles by Weingart, R

Voltage-dependent gating of single gap junction channels in an insect cell line.

Department of Physiology, University of Bern, Switzerland.

ABSTRACT

De novo formation of cell pairs was used to examine the gating properties of single gap junction channels. Two separate cells of an insect cell line (clone C6/36, derived from the mosquito Aedes albopictus) were pushed against each other to provoke formation of gap junction channels. A dual voltage-clamp method was used to control the voltage gradient between the cells (Vj) and measure the intercellular current (Ij). The first sign of channel activity was apparent 4.7 min after cell contact. Steady-state coupling reached after 30 min revealed a conductance of 8.7 nS. Channel formation involved no leak between the intra- and extracellular space. The first opening of a newly formed channel was slow (25-28 ms). Each preparation passed through a phase with only one operational gap junction channel. This period was exploited to examine the single channel properties. We found that single channels exhibit several conductance states with different conductances gamma j; a fully open state (gamma j(main state)), several substates (gamma j(substates)), a residual state (gamma j(residual)) and a closed state (gamma j(closed)). The gamma j(main state) was 375 pS, and gamma j(residual) ranged from 30 to 90 pS. The transitions between adjacent substates were 1/7-1/4 of gamma j(main state). Vj had no effect on gamma j(main state), but slightly affected gamma j (residual). The lj transitions involving gamma j(closed) were slow (15-60 ms), whereas those not involving gamma j(closed) were fast (< 2 ms). An increase in Vj led to a decrease in open channel probability. Depolarization of the membrane potential (Vm) increased the incidence of slow transitions leading to gamma j(closed). We conclude that insect gap junctions possess two gates, a fast gate controlled by Vj and giving rise to gamma j(substates) and gamma j(residual), and a slow gate sensitive to Vm and able to close the channel completely.

Related articles in Biophys. J.:

Gap junction channels: yes, there are substates, but what does that mean?

D C Spray
Biophys. J. 1994 67: 491-492. [PDF]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				X.-H. Weng, P. M. Piermarini, A. Yamahiro, M.-J. Yu, D. J. Aneshansley, and K. W. Beyenbach Gap junctions in Malpighian tubules of Aedes aegypti J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2008; 211(3): 409 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Vogel, V. Valiunas, and R. Weingart Subconductance States of Cx30 Gap Junction Channels: Data from Transfected HeLa Cells versus Data from a Mathematical Model Biophys. J., September 15, 2006; 91(6): 2337 - 2348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Liu, B. Chen, E. Gaier, J. Joshi, and Z.-W. Wang Low Conductance Gap Junctions Mediate Specific Electrical Coupling in Body-wall Muscle Cells of Caenorhabditis elegans J. Biol. Chem., March 24, 2006; 281(12): 7881 - 7889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Srinivas, J. Kronengold, F. F. Bukauskas, T. A. Bargiello, and V. K. Verselis Correlative Studies of Gating in Cx46 and Cx50 Hemichannels and Gap Junction Channels Biophys. J., March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1725 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Contreras, J. C. Saez, F. F. Bukauskas, and M. V. L. Bennett Gating and regulation of connexin 43 (Cx43) hemichannels PNAS, September 30, 2003; 100(20): 11388 - 11393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. F. Bukauskas, A. Bukauskiene, V. K. Verselis, and M. V. L. Bennett Coupling asymmetry of heterotypic connexin 45/ connexin 43-EGFP gap junctions: Properties of fast and slow gating mechanisms PNAS, May 14, 2002; 99(10): 7113 - 7118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Chen-Izu, A. P. Moreno, and R. A. Spangler Opposing gates model for voltage gating of gap junction channels Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): C1604 - C1613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Teubner, B. Odermatt, M. Guldenagel, G. Sohl, J. Degen, F. F. Bukauskas, J. Kronengold, V. K. Verselis, Y. T. Jung, C. A. Kozak, et al. Functional Expression of the New Gap Junction Gene Connexin47 Transcribed in Mouse Brain and Spinal Cord Neurons J. Neurosci., February 15, 2001; 21(4): 1117 - 1126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Valiunas, F. F. Bukauskas, and R. Weingart Conductances and Selective Permeability of Connexin43 Gap Junction Channels Examined in Neonatal Rat Heart Cells Circ. Res., May 19, 1997; 80(5): 708 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				F. F. Bukauskas, K. Jordan, A. Bukauskiene, M. V. L. Bennett, P. D. Lampe, D. W. Laird, and V. K. Verselis Clustering of connexin 43-enhanced green fluorescent protein gap junction channels and functional coupling in living cells PNAS, March 14, 2000; 97(6): 2556 - 2561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]