Biophysical Journal 67: 2251-2260 (1994)
© 1994 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sitkoff, D Articles by Honig, B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sitkoff, D Articles by Honig, B

Calculation of electrostatic effects at the amino terminus of an alpha helix.

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.

ABSTRACT

It is generally believed that the electrostatic field arising from the dipolar charge distribution in alpha helices is important for protein structure and function. We report a calculation of the electrostatic potential and field at the amino terminus of an alpha helix in water, obtained from a finite difference solution to the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. This method takes into account the detailed helix shape and charge distribution, as well as solvent, and generalized ionic strength effects. The calculated potential and field are found to be in good agreement with the experimentally observed helix-induced Stark effect and pKa shifts of a probe at the N-terminus of a stable, monomeric alpha-helical peptide (Lockhart and Kim, 1992, 1993). Ionic screening effects are reproduced at low salt concentrations. Deviations at higher salt concentrations may result from specific ion effects (specific ion-solute and/or ion-solvent interactions). The FDPB method was used to analyze the contributions from each residue, charged side chains, and solvent to the helix potential and field. Backbone contributions come primarily from the first one to two helical turns. Charged side chains contribute to helix-induced pKa shifts for certain probe-peptide combinations, even at relatively large distances from the probe (> 14 A).

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Muh, M. E.-A. Madjet, J. Adolphs, A. Abdurahman, B. Rabenstein, H. Ishikita, E.-W. Knapp, and T. Renger {alpha}-Helices direct excitation energy flow in the Fenna Matthews Olson protein PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 16862 - 16867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Olkhova, C. Hunte, E. Screpanti, E. Padan, and H. Michel Multiconformation continuum electrostatics analysis of the NhaA Na+/H+ antiporter of Escherichia coli with functional implications PNAS, February 21, 2006; 103(8): 2629 - 2634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Lehle, J. M. Kriegl, K. Nienhaus, P. Deng, S. Fengler, and G. U. Nienhaus Probing Electric Fields in Protein Cavities by Using the Vibrational Stark Effect of Carbon Monoxide Biophys. J., March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1978 - 1990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Miranda Position-dependent interactions between cysteine residues and the helix dipole Protein Sci., January 1, 2003; 12(1): 73 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Bransburg-Zabary, E. Nachliel, and M. Gutman Gauging of the PhoE Channel by a Single Freely Diffusing Proton Biophys. J., December 1, 2002; 83(6): 2987 - 3000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Villarreal and G. Montich Energetic and entropic contributions to the interactions between like-charged groups in cationic peptides: A molecular dynamics simulation study Protein Sci., August 1, 2002; 11(8): 2001 - 2009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. Nguyen, M. E. Colvin, Y. Yeh, R. E. Feeney, and W. H. Fink The Dynamics, Structure, and Conformational Free Energy of Proline-Containing Antifreeze Glycoprotein Biophys. J., June 1, 2002; 82(6): 2892 - 2905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]