Biophysical Journal 70: 684-692 (1996)
© 1996 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by van Aalten, D M Articles by Stouten, P F Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by van Aalten, D M Articles by Stouten, P F

A comparison of structural and dynamic properties of different simulation methods applied to SH3.

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, England. aalten@bmbpcu01.leeds.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

The dynamic and static properties of molecular dynamics simulations using various methods for treating solvent were compared. The SH3 protein domain was chosen as a test case because of its small size and high surface-to-volume ratio. The simulations were analyzed in structural terms by examining crystal packing, distribution of polar residues, and conservation of secondary structure. In addition, the "essential dynamics" method was applied to compare each of the molecular dynamics trajectories with a full solvent simulation. This method proved to be a powerful tool for the comparison of large concerted atomic motions in SH3. It identified methods of simulation that yielded significantly different dynamic properties compared to the full solvent simulation. Simulating SH3 using the stochastic dynamics algorithm with a vacuum (reduced charge) force field produced properties close to those of the full solvent simulation. The application of a recently described solvation term did not improve the dynamic properties. The large concerted atomic motions in the full solvent simulation as revealed by the essential dynamics method were analyzed for possible biological implications. Two loops, which have been shown to be involved in ligand binding, were seen to move in concert to open and close the ligand-binding site.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Vreede, M. A. van der Horst, K. J. Hellingwerf, W. Crielaard, and D. M. F. van Aalten PAS Domains. COMMON STRUCTURE AND COMMON FLEXIBILITY J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 18434 - 18439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G.H. Peters and R.P. Bywater Computational analysis of chain flexibility and fluctuations in Rhizomucor miehei lipase Protein Eng. Des. Sel., September 1, 1999; 12(9): 747 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]