help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 70: 1380-1390 (1996)
© 1996 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faure, C
Right arrow Articles by Dufourc, E J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faure, C
Right arrow Articles by Dufourc, E J

Comparative effects of cholesterol and cholesterol sulfate on hydration and ordering of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine membranes.

C Faure, J F Tranchant and E J Dufourc

Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal, CNRS, Pessac, France.

ABSTRACT

The comparative effect of cholesterol (CH) versus cholesterol sulfate (CS) on dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) membranes has been investigated by optical microscopy, freeze-fracture electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction, and solid state 2H and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The sulfate analogue extends the lamellar phase domain toward high water contents, and substitution of 30 mol % CH by CS in DMPC lamellae induces the trapping of 30 wt % additional water. The greater swelling of the CS-containing systems is evidenced by determination of lamellar repeat distances at maximal hydration: 147 +/- 4 A and 64 +/- 2 A in the presence of CS and CH, respectively. 2H-NMR of heavy water demonstrates that CS binds approximately 12 more water molecules at the interface than CH whereas NMR of deuterium-labeled DMPC chains reveals that 30 mol % CS orders the membrane as 15 mol % CH at high temperature and disorders much more than CH at low temperatures. The various effects of CS versus CH are discussed by taking into account attractive Van der Waals forces and repulsive steric/electrostatic interactions of the negatively charged sulfate group.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
S. Mennerick, M. Lamberta, H.-J. Shu, J. Hogins, C. Wang, D. F. Covey, L. N. Eisenman, and C. F. Zorumski
Effects on Membrane Capacitance of Steroids with Antagonist Properties at GABAA Receptors
Biophys. J., July 1, 2008; 95(1): 176 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
T. Rog, M. Pasenkiewicz-Gierula, I. Vattulainen, and M. Karttunen
What Happens if Cholesterol Is Made Smoother:: Importance of Methyl Substituents in Cholesterol Ring Structure on Phosphatidylcholine-Sterol Interaction
Biophys. J., May 15, 2007; 92(10): 3346 - 3357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
T. Rog and M. Pasenkiewicz-Gierula
Cholesterol-Sphingomyelin Interactions: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study
Biophys. J., November 15, 2006; 91(10): 3756 - 3767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
T. Rog and M. Pasenkiewicz-Gierula
Effects of Epicholesterol on the Phosphatidylcholine Bilayer: A Molecular Simulation Study
Biophys. J., March 1, 2003; 84(3): 1818 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
X. Wu and Q.-T. Li
Ca2+-induced fusion of sulfatide-containing phosphatidylethanolamine small unilamellar vesicles
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 1999; 40(7): 1254 - 1262.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Biophysical Society.