Article Information

• PDF (3297 kb)

PubMed

• Articles by M.J. Sutcliffe
• Articles by R.E. Oswald

Related Articles

• Kainate receptors with a metabotropic modus operandi

  Kainate receptors with a metabotropic modus operandi Trends in Neurosciences, Volume 30, Issue 12, 1 December 2007, Pages 630-637 Antonio Rodríguez-Moreno and Talvinder S. Sihra Abstract Kainate receptors (KARs), together with AMPA and NMDA, are typically described as ionotropic glutamate receptors. The functions of KARs have begun to be elucidated only in the last decade. Although some the actions of KARs are classically ionotropic, surprisingly others seem to involve the activation of second-messenger cascades and invoke metabotropic roles for this type of glutamate receptor. In this review, we describe these metabotropic actions of KARs in relation to the putative signalling cascades involved. Although it is still a mystery how KARs activate G proteins to stimulate second-messenger cascades, intriguingly, in very recent studies, specific subunits of KARs have been demonstrated to associate with G proteins. Altogether, the body of evidence supports the hypothesis that, together with the canonical ionotropic operation, KARs expedite long-lasting signalling by novel metabotropic modes of action. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (434 kb)

• How well can molecular modelling predict the crystal structu...

  How well can molecular modelling predict the crystal structure: the case of the ligand-binding domain of glutamate receptors Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Volume 21, Issue 3, 1 March 2000, Pages 87-92 Yoav Paas, Anne Devillers-Thiéry, Vivian I Teichberg, Jean-Pierre Changeux and Miriam Eisenstein Abstract The concept that the ligand-binding domain of vertebrate glutamate receptor channels and bacterial periplasmic substrate-binding proteins (PBPs) share similar three-dimensional (3D) structures has gained increasing support in recent years. On the basis of a dual approach that included computer-assisted molecular modelling and functional studies of site-specific mutants, theoretical 3D models of this domain have been proposed. This article reviews to what extent these models could predict the crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of an ionotropic glutamate receptor subunit recently determined at high resolution by X-ray diffraction studies. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (263 kb)

• Identification of Amino Acid Residues that Control Functiona...

  Identification of Amino Acid Residues that Control Functional Behavior in GluR5 and GluR6 Kainate Receptors Neuron, Volume 19, Issue 4, 1 October 1997, Pages 913-926 Geoffrey T Swanson, Robert W Gereau, Tim Green and Stephen F Heinemann Summary GluR5 and GluR6 kainate receptors differ in their responses to a variety of agonists, despite their relatively high primary sequence homology. We carried out a structure–function study to identify amino acids underlying these divergent responses. Patch clamp analysis of chimeric GluR5-GluR6 receptors indicated that several functionally dominant sites were localized to the C-terminal side of M1. All nonconserved amino acids in the region between M3 and M4 of GluR6 were then individually mutated to their GluR5 counterparts. We found that a single amino acid (N721 in GluR6) controls both AMPA sensitivity and domoate deactivation rates. Additionally, mutation of A689 in GluR6 slowed kainate desensitization. These functional effects were accompanied by alterations in binding affinities. These results support a critical role for these residues in receptor binding and gating activity. Summary | Full Text | PDF (248 kb)

• …more

Abstract

Structural models have been produced for three types of non-NMDA inotropic glutamate receptors: an AMPA receptor, GluR1, a kainate receptor, GluR6; and a low-molecular-weight kainate receptor from goldfish, GFKAR alpha. Modeling was restricted to the domains of the proteins that bind the neurotransmitter glutamate and that form the ion channel. Model building combined homology modeling, distance geometry, molecular mechanics, interactive modeling, and known constraints. The models indicate new potential interactions in the extracellular domain between protein and agonists, and suggest that the transition from the "closed" to the "open" state involves the movement of a conserved positive residue away from, and two conserved negative residues into, the extracellular entrance to the pore upon binding. As a first approximation, the ion channel domain was modeled with a structure comprising a central antiparallel beta-barrel that partially crosses the membrane, and against which alpha-helices from each subunit are packed; a third alpha-helix packs against these two helices in each subunit. Much, but not all, of the available data were consistent with this structure. Modifying the beta-barrel to a loop-like topology produced a model consistent with available data.