Biophysical Journal 70: 2120-2130 (1996)
© 1996 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kennedy, H J Articles by Thomas, R C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kennedy, H J Articles by Thomas, R C

Effects of injecting calcium-buffer solution on [Ca2+]i in voltage-clamped snail neurons.

Department of Physiology, The School of Medical Sciences, Bristol, England.

ABSTRACT

We have investigated why fura-2 and Ca(2+)-sensitive microelectrodes report different values for the intracellular free calcium ion concentration ([Ca(2+)]i or its negative log, pCa(i)) of snail neurons voltage-clamped to -50 or -60 mV. Both techniques were initially calibrated in vitro, using calcium calibration solutions that had ionic concentrations similar to those of snail neuron cytoplasm. Pressure injections of the same solutions at resting and elevated [Ca(2+)]i were used to calibrate both methods in vivo. In fura-2-loaded cells these pressure injections generated changes in [Ca(2+)]i that agreed well with those expected from the in vitro calibration. Thus, using fura-2 calibrated in vitro, the average resting [Ca(2+)]i was found to be 38 nM (pCa(i) 7.42 +/- 0.05). With Ca(2+)-sensitive microelectrodes, the first injection of calibration solutions always caused a negative shift in the recorded microelectrode potential, as if the injection lowered [Ca2+]i. No such effects were seen on the fura-2 ratio. When calibrated in vivo the Ca(2+)-sensitive microelectrode gave an average resting [Ca2+]i of approximately 25 nM (pCa(i) 7.6 +/- 0.1), much lower than when calibrated in vitro. We conclude that [Ca(2+)]i in snail neurons is approximately 40 nM and that Ca(2+)-sensitive microelectrodes usually cause a leak at the point of insertion. The effects of the leak were minimized by injection of a mobile calcium buffer.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. Hedrick, C. S. Fahlman, and P. E. Bickler Intracellular calcium and survival of tadpole forebrain cells in anoxia J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2005; 208(4): 681 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Reisert, P. J. Bauer, K.-W. Yau, and S. Frings The Ca-activated Cl Channel and its Control in Rat Olfactory Receptor Neurons J. Gen. Physiol., August 25, 2003; 122(3): 349 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Thomas The Effects of HCl and CaCl2 Injections on Intracellular Calcium and pH in Voltage-clamped Snail (Helix aspersa) Neurons J. Gen. Physiol., September 30, 2002; 120(4): 567 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Herring, I. M. Slotin, J. M. Baltz, and C. E. Morris Neuronal swelling and surface area regulation: elevated intracellular calcium is not a requirement Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, January 1, 1998; 274(1): C272 - C281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]