Biophysical Journal 71: 109-118 (1996)
© 1996 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in Biophys. J. Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Satcher, R L Articles by Dewey, C F Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Satcher, R L, Jr Articles by Dewey, C F, Jr

Theoretical estimates of mechanical properties of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton.

Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 02139, USA. basacher@itsa.ucsf.edu

ABSTRACT

Current modeling of endothelial cell mechanics does not account for the network of F-actin that permeates the cytoplasm. This network, the distributed cytoplasmic structural actin (DCSA), extends from apical to basal membranes, with frequent attachments. Stress fibers are intercalated within the network, with similar frequent attachments. The microscopic structure of the DCSA resembles a foam, so that the mechanical properties can be estimated with analogy to these well-studied systems. The moduli of shear and elastic deformations are estimated to be on the order of 10(5) dynes/cm2. This prediction agrees with experimental measurements of the properties of cytoplasm and endothelial cells reported elsewhere. Stress fibers can potentially increase the modulus by a factor of 2-10, depending on whether they act in series or parallel to the network in transmitting surface forces. The deformations produced by physiological flow fields are of insufficient magnitude to disrupt cell-to-cell or DCSA cross-linkages. The questions raised by this paradox, and the ramifications of implicating the previously unreported DCSA as the primary force transmission element are discussed.

Related articles in Biophys. J.:

Activation of an enzyme simulated by explicit dynamics of an active site lid.

S H Northrup
Biophys. J. 1996 71: 3. [PDF]  

Coping with cellular stress: the mechanical resistance of porous protein networks.

P A Janmey
Biophys. J. 1996 71: 3-5. [PDF]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Bathe, C. Heussinger, M. M. A. E. Claessens, A. R. Bausch, and E. Frey Cytoskeletal Bundle Mechanics Biophys. J., April 15, 2008; 94(8): 2955 - 2964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. S. Deshpande, R. M. McMeeking, and A. G. Evans A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility PNAS, September 19, 2006; 103(38): 14015 - 14020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Fernandez, P. A. Pullarkat, and A. Ott A Master Relation Defines the Nonlinear Viscoelasticity of Single Fibroblasts Biophys. J., May 15, 2006; 90(10): 3796 - 3805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kumar, I. Z. Maxwell, A. Heisterkamp, T. R. Polte, T. P. Lele, M. Salanga, E. Mazur, and D. E. Ingber Viscoelastic Retraction of Single Living Stress Fibers and Its Impact on Cell Shape, Cytoskeletal Organization, and Extracellular Matrix Mechanics Biophys. J., May 15, 2006; 90(10): 3762 - 3773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Pesen and J. H. Hoh Micromechanical Architecture of the Endothelial Cell Cortex Biophys. J., January 1, 2005; 88(1): 670 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Gardel, J. H. Shin, F. C. MacKintosh, L. Mahadevan, P. Matsudaira, and D. A. Weitz Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks Science, May 28, 2004; 304(5675): 1301 - 1305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Ingber Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2003; 116(7): 1157 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Janmey Creating a niche in the cytoskeleton: Actin reorganization by a protein kinase PNAS, December 18, 2001; 98(26): 14745 - 14747. [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Wang, K. Naruse, D. Stamenovic', J. J. Fredberg, S. M. Mijailovich, I. M. Tolic'-Norrelykke, T. Polte, R. Mannix, and D. E. Ingber Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model PNAS, July 3, 2001; 98(14): 7765 - 7770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Stamenovic and N. Wang Cellular Responses to Mechanical Stress: Invited Review: Engineering approaches to cytoskeletal mechanics J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2000; 89(5): 2085 - 2090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Guo, A. M. Weinstein, and S. Weinbaum A hydrodynamic mechanosensory hypothesis for brush border microvilli Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2000; 279(4): F698 - F712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Pourati, A. Maniotis, D. Spiegel, J. L. Schaffer, J. P. Butler, J. J. Fredberg, D. E. Ingber, D. Stamenovic, and N. Wang Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells? Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 1998; 274(5): C1283 - C1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Wang, I. M. Tolic-Norrelykke, J. Chen, S. M. Mijailovich, J. P. Butler, J. J. Fredberg, and D. Stamenovic Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2002; 282(3): C606 - C616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]