Biophysical Journal 71: 182-193 (1996)
© 1996 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DeCoursey, T E Articles by Cherny, V V Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by DeCoursey, T E Articles by Cherny, V V

Effects of buffer concentration on voltage-gated H+ currents: does diffusion limit the conductance?

Department of Molecular Biophysics and Physiology, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, illinois 60612, USA. tdecours@rpslmc.edu

ABSTRACT

The single-channel proton conductance of the voltage-gated H(+)-selective channel, like that of the F0 component of the H(+)-ATPase, is nearly constant over a wide range of pH encompassing the physiological range. To examine the possible contributions of buffer diffusion and buffer-channel proton transfer reactions to this phenomenon, the effects of buffer concentration on voltage-activated H+ currents were explored in voltage-clamped rat alveolar epithelial cells. Changes in the external buffer concentration ([B]o), evaluated using the whole-cell configuration, had only small effects on H+ currents (IH). Lowering [B]o from 100 to 1 mM did not alter the voltage-activation curve or reversal potential (Vrev) but reduced IH, typically by 10-30%. Changes in internal buffer concentration ([B]i), examined in inside-out patches, usually altered IH more distinctly and subtly changed the kinetics. Overall, the effects of changing buffer concentration were small and subtle. The maximum attenuation of the single-channel H+ current at 1 mM buffer was estimated to be approximately 20% at either mouth of the H+ channel. Therefore, the rate-determining step in H+ permeation is neither deprotonation of buffer at the inner mouth of the channel nor protonation of buffer at the external surface. Evidently the rate of H+ permeation through the channel is itself small enough that diffusion of buffer in bulk solution does not directly limit the conductance significantly.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Musset, V. V. Cherny, D. Morgan, Y. Okamura, I. S. Ramsey, D. E. Clapham, and T. E. DeCoursey Detailed comparison of expressed and native voltage-gated proton channel currents J. Physiol., May 15, 2008; 586(10): 2477 - 2486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Soyombo, S. Tjon-Kon-Sang, Y. Rbaibi, E. Bashllari, J. Bisceglia, S. Muallem, and K. Kiselyov TRP-ML1 Regulates Lysosomal pH and Acidic Lysosomal Lipid Hydrolytic Activity J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7294 - 7301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Mould, H.-C. Li, C. S. Dudlak, J. D. Lear, A. Pekosz, R. A. Lamb, and L. H. Pinto Mechanism for Proton Conduction of the M2 Ion Channel of Influenza A Virus J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2000; 275(12): 8592 - 8599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. DeCoursey, V. V. Cherny, W. Zhou, and L. L. Thomas Simultaneous activation of NADPH oxidase-related proton and electron currents in human neutrophils PNAS, June 6, 2000; 97(12): 6885 - 6889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]