help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 71: 2933-2941 (1996)
© 1996 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tobias, D J
Right arrow Articles by Klein, M L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tobias, D J
Right arrow Articles by Klein, M L

Molecular dynamics simulations of a protein on hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces.

D J Tobias, W Mar, J K Blasie and M L Klein

Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6323, USA.

ABSTRACT

Molecular dynamics simulations have been used to investigate the behavior of the peripheral membrane protein, cytochrome c, covalently tethered to hydrophobic (methyl-terminated) and hydrophilic (thiol-terminated) self-assembled monolayers (SAMs). The simulations predict that the protein will undergo minor structural changes when it is tethered to either surface, and the structures differ qualitatively on the two surfaces: the protein is less spherical on the hydrophilic SAM where the polar surface residues reach out to interact with the SAM surface. The protein is completely excluded from the hydrophobic SAM but partially dissolves in the hydrophilic SAM. Consequently, the surface of the thiol-terminated SAM is considerably less ordered than that of the methyl-terminated SAM, although a comparable, high degree of order is maintained in the bulk of both SAMs: the chains exhibit collective tilts in the nearest-neighbor direction at angles of 20 degrees and 17 degrees with respect to the surface normal in the hydrophobic and the hydrophilic SAMs, respectively. On the hydrophobic SAM the protein is oriented so that the heme plane is more nearly parallel to the surface, whereas on the hydrophilic surface it is more nearly perpendicular. The secondary structure of the protein, dominated by alpha helices, is not significantly affected, but the structure of the loops as well as the helix packing is slightly modified by the surfaces.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
L. Rivas, C. M. Soares, A. M. Baptista, J. Simaan, R. E. Di Paolo, D. H. Murgida, and P. Hildebrandt
Electric-Field-Induced Redox Potential Shifts of Tetraheme Cytochromes c3 Immobilized on Self-Assembled Monolayers: Surface-Enhanced Resonance Raman Spectroscopy and Simulation Studies
Biophys. J., June 1, 2005; 88(6): 4188 - 4199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
C. E. Nordgren, D. J. Tobias, M. L. Klein, and J. K. Blasie
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of a Hydrated Protein Vectorially Oriented on Polar and Nonpolar Soft Surfaces
Biophys. J., December 1, 2002; 83(6): 2906 - 2917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Biophysical Society.