Biophysical Journal 71: 2958-2969 (1996)
© 1996 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Swartz, P D Articles by Ichiye, T Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Swartz, P D Articles by Ichiye, T

Structural origins of redox potentials in Fe-S proteins: electrostatic potentials of crystal structures.

Center for Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-1750, USA.

ABSTRACT

Redox potentials often differ dramatically for homologous proteins that have identical redox centers. For two types of iron-sulfur proteins, the rubredoxins and the high-potential iron-sulfur proteins (HiPIPs), no structural explanations for these differences have been found. We calculated the classical electrostatic potential at the redox site using static crystal structures of four rubredoxins and four HiPIPs to identify important structural determinants of their redox potentials. The contributions from just the backbone and polar side chains are shown to explain major features of the experimental redox potentials. For instance, in the rubredoxins, the presence of Val 44 versus Ala 44 causes a backbone shift that explains a approximately 50 mV lower redox potential in one of the four rubredoxins. This result is consistent with experimental redox potentials of five additional rubredoxins with known sequence. Also, we attribute the unusually lower redox potentials of two of the HiPIPs studied to a less positive electrostatic environment around their redox sites. Finally, molecular dynamics simulations of solvent around static rubredoxin crystal structures indicate that water alone is a major factor in dampening the contribution of charged side chains, in accord with experiments showing that mutations of surface charges produce relatively little effect on redox potentials.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. A. Kantardjiev and B. P. Atanasov PHEPS: web-based pH-dependent Protein Electrostatics Server. Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2006; 34(Web Server issue): W43 - W47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I-J. Lin, E. B. Gebel, T. E. Machonkin, W. M. Westler, and J. L. Markley Changes in hydrogen-bond strengths explain reduction potentials in 10 rubredoxin variants PNAS, October 11, 2005; 102(41): 14581 - 14586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Dolan, R. B. Yelle, B. W. Beck, J. T. Fischer, and T. Ichiye Protein Control of Electron Transfer Rates via Polarization: Molecular Dynamics Studies of Rubredoxin Biophys. J., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 2030 - 2036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Ergenekan, D. Thomas, J. T. Fischer, M.-L. Tan, M. K. Eidsness, C. Kang, and T. Ichiye Prediction of Reduction Potential Changes in Rubredoxin: A Molecular Mechanics Approach Biophys. J., November 1, 2003; 85(5): 2818 - 2829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. van Beilen, M. Neuenschwander, T. H. M. Smits, C. Roth, S. B. Balada, and B. Witholt Rubredoxins Involved in Alkane Oxidation J. Bacteriol., March 15, 2002; 184(6): 1722 - 1732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Min, C. E. Ergenekan, M. K. Eidsness, T. Ichiye, and C. Kang Leucine 41 is a gate for water entry in the reduction of Clostridium pasteurianum rubredoxin Protein Sci., March 1, 2001; 10(3): 613 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text]