Biophysical Journal 71: 3046-3050 (1996)
© 1996 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ben-Tal, N Articles by Honig, B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ben-Tal, N Articles by Honig, B

Helix-helix interactions in lipid bilayers.

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.

ABSTRACT

Using a continuum model, we calculated the electrostatic interaction free energy between two alpha-helices in three environments: the aqueous phase, a low dielectric alkane phase, and a simple representation of a lipid bilayer. As was found in previous work, helix-helix interactions in the aqueous phase are quite weak, because of solvent screening, and slightly repulsive, because of desolvation effects that accompany helix assembly. In contrast, the interactions can be quite strong in a hypothetical alkane phase because desolvation effects are essentially nonexistent and because helix-helix interactions are not well screened. In this type of environment, the antiparallel helix orientation is strongly favored over the parallel orientation. In previous work we found that the free energy penalty associated with burying helix termini in a bilayer is quite high, which is why the termini tend to protrude into the solvent. Under these conditions the electrostatic interaction is strongly screened by solvent; indeed, it is sufficient for the termini to protrude a few angstroms from the two surfaces of the bilayer for their interaction to diminish almost completely. The effect is consistent with the classical model of the helix dipole in which the dipole moment is represented by point charges located at either terminus. Our results suggest, in agreement with previous models, that there is no significant nonspecific driving force for helix aggregation and, hence, that membrane protein folding must be driven by specific interactions such as close packing and salt-bridge and hydrogen bond formation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Sparr, W. L. Ash, P. V. Nazarov, D. T. S. Rijkers, M. A. Hemminga, D. P. Tieleman, and J. A. Killian Self-association of Transmembrane {alpha}-Helices in Model Membranes: IMPORTANCE OF HELIX ORIENTATION AND ROLE OF HYDROPHOBIC MISMATCH J. Biol. Chem., November 25, 2005; 280(47): 39324 - 39331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. L. Lomize, I.D. Pogozheva, and H.I. Mosberg Quantification of helix-helix binding affinities in micelles and lipid bilayers Protein Sci., October 22, 2004; 13(10): 2600 - 2612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. F. M. de Almeida, L. M. S. Loura, M. Prieto, A. Watts, A. Fedorov, and F. J. Barrantes Cholesterol Modulates the Organization of the {gamma}M4 Transmembrane Domain of the Muscle Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Biophys. J., April 1, 2004; 86(4): 2261 - 2272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Ashmore, G. S. G. Geleoc, and L. Harbott Molecular mechanisms of sound amplification in the mammalian cochlea PNAS, October 24, 2000; 97(22): 11759 - 11764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Wang, D. K. Smith, K. Moulding, and H. M. Chen The Dependence of Membrane Permeability by the Antibacterial Peptide Cecropin B and Its Analogs, CB-1 and CB-3, on Liposomes of Different Composition J. Biol. Chem., October 16, 1998; 273(42): 27438 - 27448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]