help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 71: 3501-3510 (1996)
© 1996 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berry, R M
Right arrow Articles by Berg, H C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berry, R M
Right arrow Articles by Berg, H C

Torque generated by the bacterial flagellar motor close to stall.

R M Berry and H C Berg

Rowland Institute for Science, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA.

ABSTRACT

In earlier work in which electrorotation was used to apply external torque to tethered cells of the bacterium Escherichia coli, it was found that the torque required to force flagellar motors backward was considerably larger than the torque required to stop them. That is, there appeared to be substantial barrier to backward rotation. Here, we show that in most, possibly all, cases this barrier is an artifact due to angular variation of the torque applied by electrorotation, of the motor torque, or both; the motor torque appears to be independent to speed or to vary linearly with speed up to speeds of tens of Hertz, in either direction. However, motors often break catastrophically when driven backward, so backward rotation is not equivalent to forward rotation. Also, cells can rotate backward while stalled, either in randomly timed jumps of 180 degrees or very slowly and smoothly. When cells rotate slowly and smoothly backward, the motor takes several seconds to recover after electrorotation is stopped, suggesting that some form of reversible damage has occurred. These findings do not affect the interpretation of electrorotation experiments in which motors are driven rapidly forward.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
T. Pilizota, T. Bilyard, F. Bai, M. Futai, H. Hosokawa, and R. M. Berry
A Programmable Optical Angle Clamp for Rotary Molecular Motors
Biophys. J., July 1, 2007; 93(1): 264 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
M. Miyata, W. S. Ryu, and H. C. Berg
Force and Velocity of Mycoplasma mobile Gliding
J. Bacteriol., April 1, 2002; 184(7): 1827 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. M. Berry and H. C. Berg
Absence of a barrier to backwards rotation of the bacterial flagellar motor demonstrated with optical tweezers
PNAS, December 23, 1997; 94(26): 14433 - 14437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A. S. Sechi, J. Wehland, and J. V. Small
The Isolated Comet Tail Pseudopodium of Listeria monocytogenes: A Tail of Two Actin Filament Populations, Long and Axial and Short and Random
J. Cell Biol., April 7, 1997; 137(1): 155 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the Biophysical Society.