Article Information

• PDF (701 kb)

PubMed

• Articles by P. Tang
• Articles by Y. Xu

Related Articles

• NMR Study of General Anesthetic Interaction with nAChR β2 Su...

  NMR Study of General Anesthetic Interaction with nAChR β2 Subunit Biophysical Journal, Volume 94, Issue 5, 1 March 2008, Pages 1681-1688 Vasyl Bondarenko, Victor E. Yushmanov, Yan Xu and Pei Tang Abstract The molecular basis of anesthetic interaction with membrane proteins has been explored via determination of anesthetic effects on the structure and dynamics of the extended second transmembrane domain (TM2e) of the human neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunit in dodecylphosphocholine (DPC) micelles by H and N solution-state NMR. Both 1-chloro-1,2,2-trifluorocyclobutane (F3) and isoflurane, two volatile general anesthetics, induced nonuniform changes in chemical shifts among residues in TM2e. Saturation transfer difference NMR experiments further confirmed the direct anesthetic interaction with TM2e. A significant and more specific anesthetic interaction was observed on three leucine residues at the helix C-terminus. Although the TM2e helical structure remained after addition of anesthetics, plausible shortening and lengthening of helix hydrogen bonds were evidenced by periodic changes in backbone amide chemical shifts. The TM2e backbone dynamics were determined on the basis of the N relaxation rate constants, and , and the N-[H] NOE using the model-free approach. The global tumbling time (11.7ns) of TM2e in micelles slightly increased (∼12.3–12.5ns) in the presence of anesthetics. The order parameter, , exceeded 0.9 for all N-labeled residues, showing a restricted internal motion. Anesthetics appear to have minor effect on the TM2e's internal motion. This study provided the basis for subsequent more comprehensive studies of anesthetic effects on the transmembrane domain complex of neuronal nAChR. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (285 kb)

• Emerging molecular mechanisms of general anesthetic action

  Emerging molecular mechanisms of general anesthetic action Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Volume 26, Issue 10, 1 October 2005, Pages 503-510 Hugh C. Hemmings, Myles H. Akabas, Peter A. Goldstein, James R. Trudell, Beverley A. Orser and Neil L. Harrison Abstract General anesthetics are essential to modern medicine, and yet a detailed understanding of their mechanisms of action is lacking. General anesthetics were once believed to be ‘drugs without receptors’ but this view has been largely abandoned. During the past decade significant progress in our understanding of the mechanisms of general anesthetic action at the molecular, cellular and neural systems levels has been made. Different molecular targets in various regions of the nervous system are involved in the multiple components of anesthetic action, and these targets can vary between specific anesthetics. Neurotransmitter-gated ion channels, particularly receptors for GABA and glutamate, are modulated by most anesthetics, at both synaptic and extrasynaptic sites, and additional ion channels and receptors are also being recognized as important targets for general anesthetics. In this article, these developments, which have important implications for the development of more-selective anesthetics, are reviewed in the context of recent advances in ion channel structure and function. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (317 kb)

• Channel Opening by Anesthetics and GABA Induces Similar Chan...

  Channel Opening by Anesthetics and GABA Induces Similar Changes in the GABAA Receptor M2 Segment Biophysical Journal, Volume 92, Issue 9, 1 May 2007, Pages 3130-3139 Ayelet Rosen, Moez Bali, Jeffrey Horenstein and Myles H. Akabas Abstract For many general anesthetics, their molecular basis of action involves interactions with GABA receptors. Anesthetics produce concentration-dependent effects on GABA receptors. Low concentrations potentiate submaximal GABA-induced currents. Higher concentrations directly activate the receptors. Functional effects of anesthetics have been characterized, but little is known about the conformational changes they induce. We probed anesthetic-induced conformational changes in the M2 membrane-spanning, channel-lining segment using disulfide trapping between engineered cysteines. Previously, we showed that oxidation by copper phenanthroline in the presence of GABA of the M2 6′ cysteine mutants, T261CT256C and T256C resulted in formation of an intersubunit disulfide bond between the adjacent -subunits that significantly increased the channels’ spontaneous open probability. Oxidation in GABA's absence had no effect. We examined the effect on T261CT256C and on T256C of oxidation by copper phenanthroline in the presence of potentiating and directly activating concentrations of the general anesthetics propofol, pentobarbital, and isoflurane. Oxidation in the presence of potentiating concentration of anesthetics had little effect. Oxidation in the presence of directly activating anesthetic concentrations significantly increased the channels’ spontaneous open probability. We infer that activation by anesthetics and GABA induces a similar conformational change at the M2 segment 6′ position that is related to channel opening. Abstract | Full Text | PDF (220 kb)

• …more

Abstract

Despite their structural resemblance, a pair of cyclic halogenated compounds, 1-chloro-1,2,2-trifluorocyclobutane (F3) and 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (F6), exhibit completely different anesthetic properties. Whereas the former is a potent general anesthetic, the latter produces no anesthesia. Two linear compounds, isoflurane and 2,3-dichlorooctofluorobutane (F8), although not a structural pair, also show the same anesthetic discrepancy. Using 19F nuclear magnetic spectroscopy, we investigated the time-averaged submolecular distribution of these compounds in a vesicle suspension of phosphatidylcholine lipids. A two-site exchange model was used to interpret the observed changes in resonance frequencies as a function of the solubilization of these compounds in membrane and in water. At clinically relevant concentrations, the anesthetics F3 and isoflurane distributed preferentially to regions of the membrane that permit easy contact with water. The frequency changes of these two anesthetics can be well characterized by the two-site exchange model. In contrast, the nonanesthetics F6 and F8 solubilized deeply into the lipid core, and their frequency change significantly deviated from the prediction of the model. It is concluded that although anesthetics and nonanesthetics may show similar hydrophobicity in bulk solvents such as olive oil, their distributions in various regions in biomembranes, and hence their effective concentrations at different submolecular sites, may differ significantly.