Biophysical Journal 72: 2056-2067 (1997)
© 1997 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bishop, T C Articles by Schulten, K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bishop, T C Articles by Schulten, K

How hormone receptor-DNA binding affects nucleosomal DNA: the role of symmetry.

Beckman Institute, Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 61801, USA.

ABSTRACT

Molecular dynamics simulations have been employed to determine the optimal conformation of an estrogen receptor DNA binding domain dimer bound to a consensus response element, ds(AGGTCACAGTGACCT), and to a nonconsensus response element, ds(AGAACACAGTGACCT). The structures simulated were derived from a crystallographic structure and solvated by a sphere (45-A radius) of explicit water and counterions. Long-range electrostatic interactions were accounted for during 100-ps simulations by means of a fast multipole expansion algorithm combined with a multiple time-step scheme in the molecular dynamics package NAMD. The simulations demonstrate that the dimer induces a bent and underwound (10.7 bp/turn) conformation in the DNA. The bending reflects the dyad symmetry of the receptor dimer and can be described as an S-shaped curve in the helical axis of DNA when projected onto a plane. A similar bent and underwound conformation is observed for nucleosomal DNA near the nucleosome's dyad axis that reflects the symmetry of the histone octamer. We propose that when a receptor dimer binds to a nucleosome, the most favorable dimer-DNA and histone-DNA interactions are achieved if the respective symmetry axes are aligned. Such positioning of a receptor dimer over the dyad of nucleosome B in the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter is in agreement with experiment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Shibusawa, A. N. Hollenberg, and F. E. Wondisford Thyroid Hormone Receptor DNA Binding Is Required for Both Positive and Negative Gene Regulation J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(2): 732 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Drabik, A. Liwo, C. Czaplewski, and J. Ciarkowski The investigation of the effects of counterions in protein dynamics simulations Protein Eng. Des. Sel., October 1, 2001; 14(10): 747 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]