help button home button Biophys. J.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biophysical Journal 73: 205-219 (1997)
© 1997 the Biophysical Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, L M
Right arrow Articles by Stratford, K J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wahl, L M
Right arrow Articles by Stratford, K J

The effects of synaptic noise on measurements of evoked excitatory postsynaptic response amplitudes.

L M Wahl, J J Jack, A U Larkman and K J Stratford

University Laboratory of Physiology, Oxford, England.

ABSTRACT

Spontaneously occurring synaptic events (synaptic noise) recorded intracellularly are usually assumed to be independent of evoked postsynaptic responses and to contaminate measures of postsynaptic response amplitude in a roughly Gaussian manner. Here we derive analytically the expected noise distribution for excitatory synaptic noise and investigate its effects on amplitude histograms. We propose that some fraction of this excitatory noise is initiated at the same release sites that contribute to the evoked synaptic event and develop an analytical model of the interaction between this fraction of the noise and the evoked postsynaptic response amplitude. Recording intracellularly with sharp microelectrodes in the in vitro hippocampal slice preparation, we find that excitatory synaptic noise accounts for up to 70% of the intracellular recording noise, when inhibition is blocked pharmacologically. Up to 20% of this noise shows a significant correlation with the evoked event amplitude, and the behavior of this component of the noise is consistent with a model which assumes that each release site experiences a refractory period of approximately 60 ms after release. In contrast with classical models of quantal variance, our models predict that excitatory synaptic noise can cause the apparent variance of successive peaks in an excitatory synaptic amplitude histogram to decrease from left to right, and in some cases to be less than the variance of the measured noise.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. C. Stacey and D. M. Durand
Noise and Coupling Affect Signal Detection and Bursting in a Simulated Physiological Neural Network
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2002; 88(5): 2598 - 2611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. C. Stacey and D. M. Durand
Synaptic Noise Improves Detection of Subthreshold Signals in Hippocampal CA1 Neurons
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 1104 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
W. C. Stacey and D. M. Durand
Stochastic Resonance Improves Signal Detection in Hippocampal CA1 Neurons
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2000; 83(3): 1394 - 1402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the Biophysical Society.