Biophysical Journal 73: 2393-2403 (1997)
© 1997 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bornberg-Bauer, E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bornberg-Bauer, E

How are model protein structures distributed in sequence space?

Abteilung Theoretische Bioinformatik, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany. bornberg@dkfz-heidelberg.de

ABSTRACT

The figure-to-structure maps for all uniquely folding sequences of short hydrophobic polar (HP) model proteins on a square lattice is analyzed to investigate aspects considered relevant to evolution. By ranking structures by their frequencies, few very frequent and many rare structures are found. The distribution can be empirically described by a generalized Zipf's law. All structures are relatively compact, yet the most compact ones are rare. Most sequences falling to the same structure belong to "neutral nets." These graphs in sequence space are connected by point mutations and centered around prototype sequences, which tolerate the largest number (up to 55%) of neutral mutations. Profiles have been derived from these homologous sequences. Frequent structures conserve hydrophobic cores only while rare ones are sensitive to surface mutations as well. Shape space covering, i.e., the ability to transform any structure into most others with few point mutations, is very unlikely. It is concluded that many characteristic features of the sequence-to-structure map of real proteins, such as the dominance of few folds, can be explained by the simple HP model. In analogy to protein families, nets are dense and well separated in sequence space. Potential implications in better understanding the evolution of proteins and applications to improving database searches are discussed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Sawada and S. Honda Structural Diversity of Protein Segments Follows a Power-Law Distribution Biophys. J., August 15, 2006; 91(4): 1213 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Wroe, E. Bornberg-Bauer, and H. S. Chan Comparing Folding Codes in Simple Heteropolymer Models of Protein Evolutionary Landscape: Robustness of the Superfunnel Paradigm Biophys. J., January 1, 2005; 88(1): 118 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. O. Wilke Probability of Fixation of an Advantageous Mutant in a Viral Quasispecies Genetics, February 1, 2003; 163(2): 467 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Cui, W. H. Wong, E. Bornberg-Bauer, and H. S. Chan Recombinatoric exploration of novel folded structures: A heteropolymer-based model of protein evolutionary landscapes PNAS, January 22, 2002; 99(2): 809 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Qian, B. Stenger, C. A. Wilson, J. Lin, R. Jansen, S. A. Teichmann, J. Park, W. G. Krebs, H. Yu, V. Alexandrov, et al. PartsList: a web-based system for dynamically ranking protein folds based on disparate attributes, including whole-genome expression and interaction information Nucleic Acids Res., April 15, 2001; 29(8): 1750 - 1764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Bornberg-Bauer and H. S. Chan Modeling evolutionary landscapes: Mutational stability, topology, and superfunnels in sequence space PNAS, September 14, 1999; 96(19): 10689 - 10694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Hirst The evolutionary landscape of functional model proteins Protein Eng. Des. Sel., September 1, 1999; 12(9): 721 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]