Biophysical Journal 73: 3265-3276 (1997)
© 1997 the Biophysical Society

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Soriano, G M Articles by Krishtalik, L I Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Soriano, G M Articles by Krishtalik, L I

Electrostatic effects on electron-transfer kinetics in the cytochrome f-plastocyanin complex.

Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1392, USA.

ABSTRACT

In a complex of two electron-transfer proteins, their redox potentials can be shifted due to changes in the dielectric surroundings and the electrostatic potentials at each center caused by the charged residues of the partner. These effects are dependent on the geometry of the complex. Three different docking configurations (DCs) for intracomplex electron transfer between cytochrome f and plastocyanin were studied, defined by 1) close contact of the positively charged region of cytochrome f and the negatively charged regions of plastocyanin (DC1) and by (2, 3) close contact of the surface regions adjacent to the Fe and Cu redox centers (DC2 and DC3). The equilibrium energetics for electron transfer in DC1-DC3 are the same within approximately +/-0.1 kT. The lower reorganization energy for DC2 results in a slightly lower activation energy for this complex compared with DC1 and DC3. The long heme-copper distance (approximately 24 A) in the DC1 complex drastically decreases electronic coupling and makes this complex much less favorable for electron transfer than DC2 or DC3. DC1-like complexes can only serve as docking intermediates in the pathway toward formation of an electron-transfer-competent complex. Elimination of the four positive charges arising from the lysine residues in the positive patch of cytochrome f, as accomplished by mutagenesis, exerts a negligible effect (approximately 3 mV) on the redox potential difference between cyt f and PC.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Musiani, A. Dikiy, A. Y. Semenov, and S. Ciurli Structure of the Intermolecular Complex between Plastocyanin and Cytochrome f from Spinach J. Biol. Chem., May 13, 2005; 280(19): 18833 - 18841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. H. Teixeira, A. M. Baptista, and C. M. Soares Modeling Electron Transfer Thermodynamics in Protein Complexes: Interaction between Two Cytochromes c3 Biophys. J., May 1, 2004; 86(5): 2773 - 2785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X.-S. Gong, S. Chung, and J. G. Fernandez-Velasco Electron Transfer and Stability of the Cytochrome b6f Complex in a Small Domain Deletion Mutant of Cytochrome f J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2001; 276(26): 24365 - 24371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Mertz and L. I. Krishtalik Low dielectric response in enzyme active site PNAS, February 29, 2000; 97(5): 2081 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]