| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophysical Journal 74: 242-255 (1998)
© 1998 the Biophysical Society
Biophys J, January 1998, p. 242-255, Vol. 74, No. 1
Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
A model of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ion
channel was elaborated based on the data from electron
microscopy, affinity labeling, cysteine scanning, mutagenesis
studies, and channel blockade. A restrained Monte Carlo
minimization method was used for the calculations. Five identical
M2 segments (the sequence EKMTLSISVL10LALTVFLLVI20V) were arranged in
five-helix bundles with various geometrical profiles of the pore. For
each bundle, energy profiles for chlorpromazine, QX-222,
pentamethonium, and other blocking drugs pulled through the pore were
calculated. An optimal model obtained allows all of the blockers free
access to the pore, but retards them at the rings of residues known to
contribute to the corresponding binding sites. In this model, M2
helices are necessarily kinked. They come into contact with each other
at the cytoplasmic end but diverge at the synaptic end, where N-termini
of M1 segments may contribute to the pore. The kinks disengage
-helical H-bonds between Ala12 and Ser8. The
uncoupled lone electron pairs of Ser8 carbonyl oxygens
protrude into the pore, forming a hydrophilic ring that may be
important for the permeation of cations. A split network of H-bonds
provides a flexibility to the chains
Val9-Ala12, the numerous conformations of which
form only two or three intrasegment H-bonds. The cross-ectional
dimensions of the interface between the flexible chains vary
essentially at the level of Leu11. We suggest that
conformational transitions in the chains
Val9-Ala12 are responsible for the channel
gating, whereas rotations of more stable
-helical parts of M2
segments may be necessary to transfer the channel in the desensitized
state.
Biophys J, January 1998, p. 242-255, Vol. 74, No. 1
© 1998 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/98/01/242/14 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. B. Tikhonov and B. S. Zhorov Sodium Channels: Ionic Model of Slow Inactivation and State-Dependent Drug Binding Biophys. J., September 1, 2007; 93(5): 1557 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rossokhin, G. Teodorescu, S. Grissmer, and B. S. Zhorov Interaction of d-Tubocurarine with Potassium Channels: Molecular Modeling and Ligand Binding Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2006; 69(4): 1356 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hung, K. Tai, and M. S. P. Sansom Molecular Dynamics Simulation of the M2 Helices within the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Transmembrane Domain: Structure and Collective Motions Biophys. J., May 1, 2005; 88(5): 3321 - 3333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Tikhonov, I. R. Mellor, and P. N. R. Usherwood Modeling Noncompetitive Antagonism of a Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Biophys. J., July 1, 2004; 87(1): 159 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Henchman, H.-L. Wang, S. M. Sine, P. Taylor, and J. A. McCammon Asymmetric Structural Motions of the Homomeric {alpha}7 Nicotinic Receptor Ligand Binding Domain Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulation Biophys. J., November 1, 2003; 85(5): 3007 - 3018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yu, L. Shi, and A. Karlin Structural effects of quinacrine binding in the open channel of the acetylcholine receptor PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 3907 - 3912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |