| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Biophys J, May 1998, p. 2272-2277, Vol. 74, No. 5
School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332 USA
Predictions of the minimal size an organism must have to
swim along stimulus gradients were used to compare the relative
advantages of sensory systems employing spatial (simultaneous) and
temporal (sequential) gradient detection mechanisms for small
free-swimming bacteria, leading to the following conclusions: 1) there
are environmental conditions where spatial detection mechanisms can
function for smaller organisms than can temporal mechanisms, 2)
temporal mechanisms are superior (have a smaller size limit) for the
difficult conditions of low concentration and shallow gradients, but 3)
observed bacterial chemotaxis occurs mostly under conditions where
spatial mechanisms have a smaller size limit, and 4) relevant
conditions in the natural environment favor temporal mechanisms in some
cases and spatial mechanisms in others. Thus, sensory ecology
considerations do not preclude free-swimming bacteria from employing
spatial detection mechanisms, as has been thought, and microbiologists
should be on the lookout for them. If spatial mechanisms do not occur,
the explanation should be sought elsewhere.
Biophys J, May 1998, p. 2272-2277, Vol. 74, No. 5
© 1998 by the Biophysical Society 0006-3495/98/05/2272/06 $2.00
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Thar and T. Fenchel True Chemotaxis in Oxygen Gradients of the Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacterium Thiovulum majus Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2001; 67(7): 3299 - 3303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Dusenbery Fitness Landscapes for Effects of Shape on Chemotaxis and Other Behaviors of Bacteria J. Bacteriol., November 15, 1998; 180(22): 5978 - 5983. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |